はてなキーワード: the Faとは
MSD MANUAL の Pedophilic Disorder の項、冒頭に要旨が載ってるから読んでみ。
Pedophilic disorder is characterized by recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with prepubescent children (generally ≤ 13 years); based on clinical criteria, it is diagnosed only when the patient is ≥ 16 years and ≥ 5 years older than the child who is the target of the fantasies or behaviors.
「小児性愛障害は、思春期前の児童（通常13歳以下）との性的行為を伴う反復的で強烈な性的興奮を伴う空想、衝動、または行動によって特徴づけられる。臨床基準に基づき、患者が16歳以上であり、かつ空想や行動の対象となる児童より5歳以上年長である場合にのみ診断される。」
要するに、「（中高生の頃、）同級生でシコった」では「（患者が）空想や行動の対象となる児童より5歳以上年長である場合」に該当しないため、「Pedophilic Disorder」とは診断され得ないのだ。
The fact that we got multiple fairly high-res videos of the bullet hitting his neck and blood gushing out does make a difference. The news gets shared more and more people engage with the news out of shock value and morbid fascination, which gives it more traction.
Had Paul Pelosi been shot while several cameras were filming it, it would have also become much bigger than it became.
Edit: lol the comments really bring the average redditor reading comprehension out on display. People really seem to think I'm saying that Republicans are lovely defenders of free speech or something to that effect. It's fucking weird.
The video elevates it quite a bit.
I remember Ray Rice (nfl player) domestic assault came out. Some criticism, couple game suspension.
Then the video came out. Public outcry. Full season suspension. Cut from his team.
There was no new info in the video. But seeing something happen changes perception.
Edit: for the record I don't agree with Kirk's ideology and am not defending ambivalence on other killings. I just think it hits different.
Hey everyone. I don't know where else to post this. I need to write it down before I convince myself I was just hallucinating. I’m a grad student in Japan, doing fieldwork on forgotten local folklore. That's why I was out in the absolute middle of nowhere in Gunma prefecture last night.
My plan was to visit a tiny, dying village called Yomi-touge (not its real name) that supposedly has some unique traditions. Of course, my phone lost signal hours ago, and my car's GPS, which I bought in 2015, decided to have a total meltdown. The sun went down. The mountain roads are narrow and winding, and a thick, soupy fog started to roll in. The kind of wet, heavy air that makes you feel like you’re breathing water. I was completely, hopelessly lost.
After what felt like an eternity of driving at a crawl, I saw it. A light. A single, brutally bright rectangle of light cutting through the fog. A convenience store. One of those big chains you see everywhere, a FamilyMart or a Lawson, I couldn't tell which at first. I’ve never felt so relieved in my life. I parked the car and practically ran inside, the little door chime sounding way too loud in the dead silence.
The inside was… normal. Too normal. The lights were humming with a high-pitched buzz that drilled into my skull. The shelves were perfectly stocked. The air smelled of cheap air freshener and something else… something sweet and hot, like ozone or burnt sugar.
He was a young guy, maybe my age. Pale, drenched in sweat, with dark circles under his eyes like bruises. He moved with a painful stiffness, like every joint was rusted. He muttered a "Irasshaimase…" without even looking at me, his eyes fixed on the counter. His arms were covered in these intricate, dark tattoos, winding from his wrists up under his sleeves. I figured he was just sick, or on a rough shift. I felt bad for him.
I grabbed a can of coffee and went to the counter. "Sorry to bother you," I started in Japanese, "I'm pretty lost. Could you tell me where I am?"
He looked up, and his eyes didn't seem to focus on me. It was like he was looking at a screen a few inches in front of my face. "We do not provide directional information," he said, his voice a flat, rehearsed monotone. "Will that be all for you?"
Okay, weird, but whatever. Maybe it's store policy. As he reached for my coffee, his sleeve slid up. The tattoos on his arm… they weren’t just pictures. For a split second, I swear to God, the lines of ink shifted. They writhed, like tiny black worms under his skin, and a patch of his forearm glowed with a faint, sickly red light. He flinched, a sharp intake of breath, and quickly pulled his sleeve down.
I just froze. I couldn’t have seen that, right? I was tired, my eyes were playing tricks on me.
The person who walked in… I don’t know how to describe them. It was a man, I think. He was tall and wore an old, soaked trench coat. But his face… it was like my brain refused to process it. It wasn't that he had no face, it was that my eyes would slide right off it. It was a blur, a glitch, a 404 error in human form.
The clerk didn't seem surprised. He didn't even seem to see him as strange. His posture just became even more rigid. The red glow on his arm pulsed again, brighter this time, visible through his sleeve.
The faceless man didn't speak. He just stood there. The clerk, without a word, turned. But he didn't go to the coolers. He kept his back to the man, and held out his left hand, palm up. I heard a soft, wet, squelching sound. From a small, dark slit in the center of his palm that I hadn't noticed before, a small carton of strawberry milk, the kind you give to kids, just… emerged. It was produced out of his hand. It was wet with a clear, viscous fluid.
He placed it on the counter. "Here is the requested product," the clerk said, his voice straining. "The transaction is complete."
The faceless man picked up the strawberry milk. He put it in his coat pocket. And then he just… faded. He didn’t walk out the door. He dissolved into the humming air, like heat haze. A second later, he was gone.
The clerk let out a long, shuddering breath and swayed on his feet. He leaned heavily on the counter, his face sheet-white. He looked utterly, existentially exhausted. He saw me staring, my mouth hanging open, the can of coffee still in my hand.
For the first time, a flicker of something real, something human, crossed his face. It was pure, undiluted terror.
"You… are not a regular customer," he whispered, his voice trembling. "Your… concept is too stable. Please. Leave."
I didn't need to be told twice. I threw a 500 yen coin on the counter and ran out of there so fast I think I broke the sound barrier. I didn't even take my coffee. I just got in my car and drove, I don't know in which direction, I just drove.
I'm at a service station now, about 100km away. The sun is coming up. I can't stop shaking. It wasn't a dream. I know it wasn't. Because when I was fumbling for my keys, I realized I had accidentally grabbed the receipt from the counter.
It’s not for my coffee. It’s for the other transaction. It just has one item listed. It doesn't say "Strawberry Milk." It says:
ITEM: CONCEPTUAL SALVATION (FLAVOR: CHILDHOOD NOSTALGIA) - 1 UNIT
PRICE: ¥0
METHOD: ANNULMENT
Has anyone seen a store like this? What the hell is happening in the mountains of Gunma? What did I see? And God, that poor kid working the counter. He isn't in trouble. He's a part of it. He's the machine.
Please, I am writing to you with desperation and I will be relieved if you could reply soon.
My name is Julian Bikram, I had a fiance and we have been living together since 2019 with a daughter.
He is a gold broker and a foreigner. He was attacked in 2022 by bandits while he was in a gold mining site and died after some days in the hospital.
Since the incident happened, no one has contacted me from his family aside his local friends here that came for condolence.
Please , I can't keep waiting for his relatives, this is 3 years of no contact from them, it's obvious they don't know us.
I have spoken with his bank here, they confirmed he has a floating balance in his account and after much deliberation for them to release the money to me, they said I should give them the contact of his relative.
I am helpless with their decision , because i don't know his people, they have not contacted us since the incident which is extremely understandable that they don't know about us.
Therefore please, i am appealing to you (based on the reality that you have the same last name like him) to stand for me as the family member, so that they can accept to release the money back to me.
The bank is not asking for any payment
They are only asking for his relatives to be aware and agreed with them to pay me
Please, I want you to help me for the sake of my child's support, even if we can share the money.
Please, for the sake of humanity, please help me.
Juilan
要約すると
差出人は「ジュリアン・ビクラム」と名乗り、婚約者がいたがその婚約者が2022年に金鉱山で強盗に襲われて死亡したという話をしています。婚約者の家族とは連絡が取れず、銀行に預けられているお金を受け取るためには親族の同意が必要だと銀行に言われたと主張しています。
そこで、あなたが婚約者と同じ苗字を持っているという理由で、代わりに親族として名乗り出てほしいと頼んでいます。報酬としてそのお金を分け合うことを提案し、「人道的な理由で助けてほしい」と懇願しています。
おもろいからやり取りしようかな
【悲報】マーベル「ファンタスティック4」のインタビューで役者たちがキャラ改変と政治を語り大ブーイング！？「なぜ政治の話ばかりするのか？」「スタッフがキャラクターをまったく理解していない！」
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VBE2NQeqZE
ジェンダーポリティクスとかでたらめなことを言うことを投資家が支持するのは異常で、何らかの裏金でも流れているとしか思えない。ジェンダーポリティクスは単なるでたらめで妄想で学問ではない。
単純い利権のためにやっているだけ、ムダ。こいつらの不平等は単なる妄想に過ぎない。全部金と利権だけ。公金チューチュースキームに過ぎない。
ファンタスティックフォーは公開３か月前に再撮影に入っているとのこと。
絶対に売れない映画を大金をかけて作り、映画館をからにするにも拘わらず投資家やファンドが支持するのは、どこかに金が流れていないと説明がつかない。
そもそもゴームズの女はドアマットどころかバリア貼っていたじゃないか。
全員ゴームズを読んだことも見たこともないとしか言いようがない。こんな馬鹿どもを出せばそら怒るわ。
Fandom Pulse
@fandompulse
Vanessa Kirby Confirms 'Fantastic Four: First Steps' Explores Gender Politics With Sue Storm
Culture Crave 🍿
@CultureCrave
Joseph Quinn on his adaptation of Johnny Storm in #FantasticFour
"Kevin Feige and I were speaking about previous iterations of him ... He was branded as this womanizing, devil-may-care guy, but is that sexy these days? I don't think so. This version of Johnny is less callous with other people's feelings"
ジョセフ・クインが『ジョニー・ストーム』の翻案について語る#FantasticFour
「ケヴィン・ファイギと私は、以前のジョニーについて話していました…彼は女好きで、何事にも動じない男というレッテルを貼られていましたが、今どきそれが魅力的でしょうか？私はそうは思いません。今のジョニーは、他人の気持ちにそれほど冷淡ではありません」
翻案もなにもそもそもゴームズ見ていないとしか言いようがないレベルで程度が低い。
THE FANTASTIC FOUR Director And Cast Reveal Some HUGE Changes To The Human Torch And Invisible Woman
とても良い質問です。
実は、こうした社会的な対立や論争について、タルムードは深い知恵を与えてくれます。タルムードはまさに「議論」の書でありながら、その目的は対立ではなく、真理の追求と平和的共存です。
まず前提として、タルムードには「エルケ・アヴォット（פרקי אבות, Ethics of the Fathers）」という倫理的な教えがあり、その中でこう説かれています：
"אֵיזֶהוּ חָכָם? הַלּוֹמֵד מִכָּל אָדָם."
つまり、たとえ自分と考えが異なる人であっても、その人から学ぶ姿勢を持つことが重要だとされています。SNSでの男女論争は、しばしば「勝ち負け」や「正しさの押し付け」になりがちですが、タルムード的な視点では「相手の声を聴く」「違いから学ぶ」ことが平和への第一歩です。
さらに、タルムードはよく「争いは天の名のためにあるべし」という考え方を持っています。
つまり、争いがあったとしても、それが純粋に真理を求めるためであれば価値がある。しかし、自己の名誉や他人を傷つけるための争いは避けなければならない、と。
1. 相手の意見を尊重し、聴く姿勢を持つ。→「すべての人から学ぶ者」になる。
2. 議論は目的を見失わないこと。→「天の名のための争い」はよいが、私的な感情での争いは避ける。
"הֱוֵי מִתַּלְמִידָיו שֶׁל אַהֲרֹן, אוֹהֵב שָׁלוֹם וְרוֹדֵף שָׁלוֹם."
人間一人ひとりには無限の価値があるとタルムードは教えます（サンヘドリン37a）。
ですので、SNSの論争を鎮めるためには「勝つこと」ではなく、「共に知恵を深め合うこと」が目的だと意識を変えることが大切です。
当然白人ではないうえに、白雪姫を完全に侮辱しているため、それと区別するために茶雪姫と呼ばれる。
StillDevonTracey
@TheXReportCard
REU
@REU54948702
白雪姫の実写映画の評価と、演者の映画に関係ないとこでの主義主張は全く関係ないよ
ガルガドットがイスラエル支持してても女王に相応しい美しさであることに変わりなく、フリーパレスチナを唱えるレイチェルゼグラー がオリジナル白雪姫を馬鹿にしたのも変わりない
850 件の表示
イスラエル出身、元軍人、そして当然パレスチナでイスラエルが虐殺しても正当化しており、パレスチナ関係者を敵に回している。一方ゼグラーはパレスチナを支持している。彼女はある意味プロパガンダであり、スパイとも言っていい。スパイが隠れていなくてもできる仕事がプロパガンダ。映画では善戦したという評価にはなるが、総合すると映画には誰一人として支持できる人間が存在しないのである。
スティーヴン・スピルバーグ監督の『ウエスト・サイド・ストーリー』で銀幕デビューを飾った彼女は、南米コロンビアの血をひくラテン系。
茶雪姫はスピルバーグの推薦もあった。
映画外の問題もさることながら、ストーリーが破綻している。まず王子さまは出てこない。７人の小人はCG、なのに悪役の小人は人間。リーダーのように描かれるが掃除させるとブータれるクソガキ。白雪姫にするため、吹雪の夜に生まれたとか後付けの設定。
何がshe her hersじゃ。お前はクローン２号かなにかか？人に向かって代名詞を指定するんじゃない。ポリコレとか言っているけど全く意味がない。コミュ障でしょ。
下のリンクによると11月にトランプが当選すると泣きを入れたらしいが、当然、発言には責任を取るのがあたりまえ。これだけZ世代だのなんだの言っておいて謝罪だけで済むわけないだろ。21歳でヨチヨチするほど世界は甘くない。
Zegler in November apologized for her political comments, saying the presidential election caused her to lash out negatively.
“Hatred and anger have caused us to move further and further away from peace and understanding, and I am sorry I contributed to the negative discourse,” she said. “I am committed to contributing positively toward a better tomorrow.”
アニメ版は怖すぎる
女性（白雪姫）につきまとう男性（王子）のラブストーリーに焦点があてられていた。奇妙よ、奇妙だわ」と発言。オリジナル版に出てくる王子を“ストーカー”と表現し、そういった男性を登場させる物語を「時代遅れ」と語った
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/23c9258538f2c2487793a3aa427308172392ab20:『白雪姫』を演じたラテン系女優、「王子はストーカー」と発言し炎上も…評価は上々？]
「真実の愛があると夢見ていない。彼女の夢はリーダーになること。亡くなった父親が『恐れを知らず、公正で勇敢で偽らなければなれる』と教えてくれたリーダーになりたいと思っている」
https://www.elle.com/jp/culture/celebgossip/a44812189/snow-white-rachel-zegler-feminism-gaslighting-230815/:実写版『白雪姫』のレイチェル・ゼグラー、アニメ版のプリンセスを批判 「偽フェミニスト」だと反論される]
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/jswWg9293MM
このようにどうやって映画館に人が来ないようにするため、社会活動家やお金をもらった批評家、何より主役の素晴らしいネガキャンがあった。
Z世代以前にメスガキでしかない。アイドルにすらなれないのだからガキである。
ディズニー実写版「白雪姫」がこれほど物議を醸す6つの理由。配役への差別的な批判だけではない
白雪姫役にラテン系俳優が起用されたことへの人種差別的批判だけではない。いったい何がここまで物議を醸しているのか。
https://www.huffingtonpost.jp/entry/story_jp_67da03bde4b04eaabffbc824
ゼグラーさんはTwitterで「ネット上で私を擁護してくれる人たちからの愛にはとても感謝しています」と述べた一方、「私のキャスティングに関する無意味な談話にはタグ付けしないでほしい」「本当に見たくない」と投稿。
幼少期のゼグラーさんが白雪姫と「美女と野獣」のベルに扮した写真と共に、「すべての子どもが、何があってもプリンセスでなれることを知っていて欲しい」とコメントを添えた。
人種差別とか言って批判を回避しようとするアホが多過ぎである。これ書いたやつもまとめてクビにすべきだ。一番の被害者はディズニーと映画ファンである。この辺からもZ世代は単なるお調子者のメスガキで責任感が全くないことがわかるし、甘やかされている。
ディズニーは数十のメディアを『白雪姫』プレミア上映に招待しなかったと報じられている。複数の報道機関は、この小規模なイベントは映画をめぐる否定的な感情への反応であると示唆した。
露骨な差別主義者ってディズニーの事なんじゃないか？誰一人取り残さないとかマイノリティへの配慮？
ジョー・ローガン、興行的に失敗した『白雪姫』の調査をDOGEに要請
資金の流れがおかしい。確かに王子もいないし、７人の小人はCGなので、費用がかかっていない。一体どこへ消えたのか。
Collin Rugg
@CollinRugg
Teenage boys are going absolutely nuts in movie theaters during the new Minecraft Movie, throwing popcorn in the air and even bringing live chickens into the theater.
This is the film crushing Snow White at the box office right now.
The fans go nuts when Jack Black's character yells "Chicken Jockey," which is a rare baby zombie that rides on the back of a chicken in Minecraft.
"It’s way too funny. It’s been a total blast. I’m just laughing my brains out every time someone sends me a new video," said director Jared Hess.
The Minecraft Movie is the biggest opening of 2025 so far, crushing Snow White.
It made $301 million globally in the opening weekend compared to Snow White's opening weekend of $86.1 million
10代の少年たちは、映画館で新作『マインクラフト』の上映中に大騒ぎし、ポップコーンを空中に投げたり、生きた鶏を劇場に持ち込んだりしている。
ジャック・ブラック演じるキャラクターが「チキンジョッキー」と叫ぶと、ファンは大騒ぎになる。チキンジョッキーとは、『マインクラフト』でニワトリの背中に乗る珍しいゾンビの赤ちゃんのことである。
「面白すぎる。本当に最高だ。誰かが新しいビデオを送ってくれるたびに、大笑いしちゃう」と監督のジャレッド・ヘスさんは語った。
生きた鶏？とりあえず３倍以上の差がある。
Mr.Alf
@45yy561
Just learned that the Minecraft movie beat the Snow White movie in the box office in a week.
#MinecraftMovie #Minecraft #SnowWhiteTH
マインクラフトの映画が1週間で白雪姫の映画の興行収入を上回ったことを知りました。
What they had been building was a community. A community in which people went to every imaginable length to help out every single person they could—a place where international trade policy and CDOs were mere distant thoughts.
But as is they way the world works now, small towns in small empty states, a hundred years of community building or not, are just simply a sacrifice the powers that be are willing to make in exchange for a mere few more bips.
My papa was forced into retirement in 2011, and my nana stayed working at the school for the next decade. My papa though, wasn’t quite willing to throw in the towel. He tried increasing the size of his herd of brangus, but alas, cattle farming has been a cash-negative endeavor for several decades.
Like Whirlpool all the other manufacturing plants. There was no work to be found for the thousands of people combined plant workers that had been laid off in the wake of 2008. Every single way of making an honest living had up and gone with the wind to Mexico and East Asia.
There was nothing left but being a Gas station, Dollar General or Walmart cashier, and Walmart paid $7.25 an hour back then.
But you’d be hard pressed to even work at a gas station. There are only two gas stations immediately around that 1,200-person town; and one of them just went out of business, the other is owned by a Pakistani family.
As a consequence, the average household income in that town is now ~$30,000 a year. 90% of the children are on free and reduced lunch, most of the families that remain are on state assistance, and opioid and meth use has reached unprecedented rates.
And yet, “learn to code” they contemptuously sneer, all while gleefully kicking the door wide open to a swarm of cheap, barely-proficient immigrants, tanking the tech labor market behind everyone’s back.
4/6
彼らが築き上げてきたのはコミュニティでした。人々が考えられる限りのあらゆる手段を講じて、できる限りのあらゆる人々を助けるコミュニティであり、国際貿易政策やCDOが単なる遠い考えである場所でした。
しかし、現在の世界の仕組みでは、小さな空っぽの州の小さな町は、コミュニティの構築が100年であろうとなかろうと、権力者がほんの少しの利益と引き換えに喜んで払う犠牲に過ぎません。
私の父は 2011 年に強制的に退職させられ、祖母はその後 10 年間学校で働き続けました。しかし、父は諦めるつもりはありませんでした。ブランガスの群れを増やそうとしましたが、残念ながら、牛の飼育は数十年にわたって赤字が続いていました。
ワールプール社のような他の製造工場も同様です。2008 年以降に解雇された工場労働者を合わせた数千人に仕事は見つかりませんでした。まともな生計を立てる手段はすべてメキシコや東アジアに消えていきました。
ガソリンスタンド、ダラージェネラル、またはウォルマートのレジ係になるしか選択肢はなく、当時ウォルマートの時給は 7.25 ドルでした。
しかし、ガソリンスタンドで働くことさえ難しいでしょう。人口 1,200 人のその町のすぐ近くにはガソリンスタンドが 2 つしかありません。そのうちの 1 つは最近廃業し、もう 1 つはパキスタン人の家族が経営しています。
その結果、その町の平均世帯収入は現在年間約3万ドルです。90%の児童は無料または割引の昼食を食べて、残っている家族のほとんどは州の援助を受けており、オピオイドとメタンフェタミンの使用率は前例のないレベルに達しています。
それでも、彼らは「コーディングを学べ」と軽蔑的に冷笑し、安っぽくてほとんど熟練していない移民の群れに喜んで扉を大きく開け放ち、誰も知らないうちにテクノロジー労働市場を崩壊させている。
https://x.com/FedPoasting/status/1908020399838724436
Bugman Hegel
@FedPoasting
My family, stretching back to the 1600s, has given their blood, sweat, and tears making this country what it is. Building it up from dirt. From nothing.
400 years of living in unimaginably hostile conditions. Braving the disease, deadly weather, tribal nations, treachery, and lawlessness that is inherent to an ungoverned, unsettled territory. This nation was built, brick by brick, by bravest, toughest, most resilient people on the face of the earth.
And yet, for the past 60 years, the academic sophists in the ivory towers, the pigs in Washington, and the good-for-nothing parasites of the banking class have not only seen it fit to spit on their names, their sacrifices, their community, their race, and their religion, but also spit on their legacies, their children, their grandchildren, and their rightful inheritance. There are not the words in the English language to describe the evil of the orchestrated treachery that the United States government and those so interested, have inflicted on the inheritors of this nation.
The blood that was spilled carving this nation out of the god-forsaken backwaters it was, was a real, material thing. Blood, like people, is a material thing. And nations are comprised of people. America is a people. Ideas can’t shed blood; only people can. Ideas can’t sacrifice; only people can.
To call America an “idea” alone is to forsake all of those who shed their real blood and lost their real lives to construct the very comfort and luxury required to sit back and even consider calling such a sacrifice an “idea.”
私の一族は 1600 年代まで遡り、血と汗と涙を流してこの国を今の姿に築き上げてきました。土から、何もないところから築き上げてきたのです。
想像を絶するほど過酷な状況で 400 年間暮らしてきました。病気、恐ろしい天候、部族国家、裏切り、そして統治されていない未開拓の領土につきものの無法状態に立ち向かってきました。この国は、地球上で最も勇敢で、最もタフで、最も粘り強い人々によって、レンガを一つずつ積み上げて築かれました。
しかし、過去 60 年間、象牙の塔にいる学問上の詭弁家、ワシントンの豚野郎、銀行家の役立たずの寄生虫たちは、彼らの名前、彼らの犠牲、彼らのコミュニティ、彼らの人種、彼らの宗教に唾を吐くだけでなく、彼らの遺産、彼らの子供、彼らの孫、そして彼らの正当な相続財産にも唾を吐きかけてきました。米国政府とそれに関心を持つ人々がこの国の継承者に与えた組織的な裏切りの悪を表現できる言葉は英語には存在しません。
かつて神に見放された辺境の地であったこの国を切り開くために流された血は、現実の物質的なものでした。血は、人々と同様、物質的なものです。そして国家は人々で構成されています。アメリカは人々です。思想は血を流すことはできません。できるのは人々だけです。思想は犠牲を払うことはできません。できるのは人々だけです。
アメリカを「理念」と呼ぶことは、ただ座ってそのような犠牲を「理念」と呼ぶことを考えるために必要な快適さと贅沢さを築くために、本当の血を流し、本当の命を失ったすべての人々を見捨てることです。
https://x.com/FedPoasting/status/1908020403059949699
Bugman Hegel
@FedPoasting
For the last six decades, every single legacy institution, academic institution, government institution, and NGO has spent the past decade calling the very people who built this nation various iterations of uniquely, inherently, ontologically evil, calling us racists, and rapists, and genociders, and slavers, and oppressors, and backwoods, and inbreds, and reprobates, and white trash—all the while not-so-secretly making contingency plans for what to do with those of us ultimately considered excess biomass.
The American people decided at the ballot box. It’s time to pay the piper.
Bring back manufacturing, slap tariffs on imports, close the borders, deport the illegals, fire every single spiteful government-funded mutant, and remove the dollar from its position as world reserve currency. Americans, especially those of us who consider ourselves “ethnically” Heritage American—do not care how much it’s going to cost us in the short term; we are willing to sacrifice if it means we don’t have to sit and watch what’s left of our rightful inheritance be burned to the ground.
We want those guilty to pay their due penance. We want heads to roll.
過去 60 年間、あらゆる伝統的な機関、学術機関、政府機関、NGO は、この国を築いたまさにその人々を、さまざまな意味で独特で、本質的に、存在論的に悪であると呼び、私たちを人種差別主義者、強姦者、大量虐殺者、奴隷所有者、抑圧者、田舎者、近親交配者、堕落者、白人ゴミと呼び続けてきました。その間ずっと、余剰バイオマスと見なされる私たちのような人々をどうするかについて、それほど秘密ではない緊急時対応計画を立てていました。
製造業を復活させ、輸入品に関税を課し、国境を封鎖し、不法移民を国外追放し、政府資金で賄われている意地悪な変異種を一人残らず解雇し、ドルを世界の準備通貨の地位から排除する。アメリカ人、特に自分たちを「民族的に」伝統的なアメリカ人だと考える私たちは、短期的にどれだけの費用がかかるかなど気にしない。正当な遺産の残りが焼き尽くされるのをただ座って見過ごす必要がないなら、喜んで犠牲を払うつもりだ。
私たちは罪を犯した者たちに当然の罰を与えてほしい。首が飛ぶことを望んでいる。
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
The assertion that English constitutes a "hostile language" is emblematic of a profound misunderstanding of the intricate relationship between language, culture, and communication. Such a reductionist viewpoint, often stemming from cultural insularity or an oversimplified interpretation of global dynamics, fails to recognize the multifaceted and adaptive nature of language as a vehicle for connection rather than division.
Language, in its most fundamental form, serves as a sophisticated instrument for human expression and interaction. It encapsulates the complexities of thought, emotion, and cultural nuance. To label English as "hostile" is to overlook its role as a global lingua franca that facilitates dialogue among diverse cultures. This designation not only undermines the rich tapestry of English-speaking societies but also dismisses the language's capacity for evolution and adaptation, reflecting the very societies it serves.
Critics often conflate the global dominance of English with cultural imperialism, positing that its prevalence signifies an erosion of local languages and cultures. However, this perspective neglects the agency of non-native speakers who actively adopt and adapt English to meet their communicative needs. The expansion of English is not merely an imposition; it is a testament to its utility and flexibility in diverse contexts. By embracing English, individuals from various linguistic backgrounds enhance their communicative repertoire without relinquishing their cultural identities.
To characterize English as "hostile" implies an intrinsic aggression or antagonism within the language itself—a notion that is fundamentally flawed. Hostility is not an inherent characteristic of language but rather a reflection of the sociopolitical contexts in which it is employed. The potential for misunderstanding or conflict arises not from the linguistic medium but from the intentions and attitudes of its speakers. Thus, vilifying English misplaces responsibility for interpersonal and intercultural tensions that are often rooted in broader societal issues.
In an increasingly interconnected world, English functions as a crucial bridge across cultural divides. It enables collaboration in vital fields such as science, technology, diplomacy, and commerce, fostering innovation and mutual understanding. Proficiency in English can empower individuals and communities by providing access to resources and opportunities that might otherwise remain elusive. This empowerment challenges the notion of hostility; instead, it highlights the language's role as an enabler of progress and cooperation.
In conclusion, the characterization of English as a "hostile language" represents a reductive oversimplification that fails to capture the complexities inherent in linguistic interaction within our globalized society. Rather than viewing languages through a lens of hostility or division, we should embrace their potential for fostering understanding and collaboration. It is imperative to cultivate a more nuanced appreciation for the role of English—and indeed all languages—in shaping our shared human experience. Only through such intellectual rigor can we transcend divisive narratives and celebrate the rich diversity that language offers in our interconnected world.
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/items/528f479f-fd3c-43fd-9463-7c2923560573
ある人の嗅覚倫理に関する論文だけど、文献だけで匂いが影響を与えると書いてるから女性に学位を与えるのは無駄だと言われる。
論文書くなら、裁判官にセンサーを取り付けるなり、何人かの被験者にルールを守った上で反応を調べるとかやりようはあったはず。
アタリマエのことを調べるというのは裁判での証拠提出のときに役立つからもっと調べてほしい。
けど、統計学的手法を駆使するなどして、裁判官が9割型認める内容でないと価値がない。
contemporary relevance. I suggest that smell very often invokes identity in a way that signifies an individual’s worth and status in an inarguable manner that short-circuits conscious reflection. This can be accounted for by acknowledging olfaction’s strongly affective nature, which produces such strong bodily sensations and emotions that reflexivity is bypassed in favour of a behavioural or cognitive solution that assuages the intense feeling most immediately. Olfactory disgust, therefore, tends to result in rejection, while harmful forms of olfactory desire may result in sublimation or subjugation. My thesis is particularly attentive to tensions and ambivalences that complicate the typically bifurcated affective spectrum of olfactory experiences, drawing attention to (dis)pleasurable olfactory relations that have socio-political utility. I argue that literary fiction is not only an arena in which olfactory logics can be instantiated, but also a laboratory in which possibilities for new kinds of relations and connections can be fostered and tested. Chapter One explores how smell can be used to indicate class antipathies, partly as they relate to homelessness, beginning with George Orwell’s seminal non-fiction text, The Road to Wigan Pier (1936), before considering Iain Sinclair’s The Last London (2017) and Bong Joon Ho’s Parasite (2019). In Chapter Two I explore the fantastical, idealistic, and utopic thinking that surrounds olfaction, which presents smell as fundamentally non-human, by addressing J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace (1999), Virginia Woolf’s Flush (1933), Rachel Yoder’s Nightbitch (2021), and Laura Jean McKay’s The Animals in That Country (2020). Chapter Three focuses on the intersectional olfactory dimensions of ‘misogynoir’—the coextensive anti-Black racism and misogyny that Black women experience—and considers Toni Morrison’s Tar Baby (1981), Bernice McFadden’s Sugar (2000) and Raven Leilani’s Luster (2020). In Chapter Four, I conceptualise an oppressive olfactory logic, which is used against women and girls in order to legitimise their harassment or abuse, drawing primarily on Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita (1955), but also Patrick Süskind’s Perfume (1985). Chapter Five discusses two forms of olfactory desire—perversion and queerness—which have separate moral valences. I address J. M. Coetzee’s The Master of Petersburg (1994), Ann Quin’s Berg (1964), and Sam Byers’ Come Join Our Disease (2020), and argue for fiction’s role in reorienting readers’ habitual relations to olfaction.
2024-06-25
In the ever-evolving travel industry, travel portal have become fundamental tools for businesses looking to enhance customer experience It's streamline operations. With traveler increasingly relying on digital platforms to book everything from flights to hotels, the need for sophisticated, user-friendly, It's high-performing travel portals has never been more crucial. The growth of this sector is driven by numerous factors, including technological advancements, consumer behavior shifts, It's the quest for organization. This article explores the top trends in travel portals development that every business should pay attention to in 2024 It's beyond.
1. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Travel Portal Development
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have quickly become foundational components of travel portal development. These technologies are revolutionizing the way businesses personalize services, predict consumer behavior, and optimize booking processes. AI and ML algorithms analyze large data sets to understand customers preferences, allowing for real-time customization of travel recommendations. From dynamic pricing models to
customized travel suggestions, AI help businesses offer an unequaled user experience.
For instance, AI chatbots are becoming successively popular for customer service. They can answer customer queries 24/7, assist in bookings, It's even provide real-time travel updates, enhancing the overall customers experience. Furthermore, AI-powered tools such as a recommendation engines analyze past booking behavior to suggest tailored itineraries, making travel planning much easier for user.
2. Mobile-First Approach for Travel Portal Development
With the increasing use of smartphones, as a mobile first approach is no longer optional for businesses in the travel industry. More It's more travelers are relying on their smartphones for booking flights, boardinghouse, It's activities on the go. For travel portals to stay competitive, ensuring seamless mobile optimization is crucial.
A mobile optimized travel portal ensures that users have access to the same features and functionalities on their mobile devices as they would on a desktop. It’s not just about making the site responsive—it’s about creating an intuitive, fast, and easy to navigate experience. This includes features like mobile-specific payment options, mobile check-in for airlines It's hotels, It's easy access to customers support.
3. Integration of Blockchain for Secure Transactions
Blockchain technology is making waves across various industries, and the travel sector is no exception. Blockchain based travel portals offer a significant advantage when it comes to security It's transparency. Blockchain’s ability to provide secure, tamper proof record makes it ideal for transactions involving bookings, payment, It's loyalty program.
By integrating blockchain, travel businesses can ensure secure It's fast transactions, protect customer data, It's reduce fraud. Blockchain also facilitates easier It's more transparent loyalty program management. Travelers can accumulate rewards points across various service providers, all within the same blockchain framework, creating as a more cohesive It's rewarding experience.
4. Enhanced Payment Solutions and Digital Wallets
One of the most significant changes in the travel industry has been the shift toward contactless payment. Digital wallets, such as a Apple Pay, Google Wallet, It's cryptocurrency wallets, are now widely accepted in travel portals. These payment solutions offer a faster, more secure, It's convenient way for travelers to complete transactions.
For businesses, adopting multiple payment gateways is essential for attracting global customer. International traveler can face issues with currency exchange It's transaction fees, but by offering localized payment method It's supporting a wide range of digital wallets, businesses can significantly improve customers satisfaction It's retention.
5. Voice Search and Virtual Assistants
Voice search is one of the fastest growing trends in the tech world, and the travel industry is no exception. Voice search optimization is becoming an essential part of travel portal development. With the rise of virtual assistants like Amazon’s Alexa, Google Assistant, It's Apple’s Siri, travelers are increasingly using voice command to search for flights, hotels, It's destinations.
For businesses, this means optimizing travel portals for voice search. Voice-friendly portal with natural language processing capabilities can provide users with more accurate results It's make booking processes quicker It's easier. Additionally, integrating virtual assistants into portals can enhance customers service by answering common queries It's assisting with bookings.
6. Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) Experiences
(AR) and (VR) technologies are transforming the way travelers experience destinations and plan their trips. Intensified Reality allows traveler to view destinations, hotel, or local attractions in real time through their mobile devices. For example, an AR feature in a travel portal could allow user to take a virtual tour of a hotel room or explore a city’s landmarks in 3D.
Virtual Reality, on the other hand, can transport users to a destination before they even book their trip, providing immersive previews of their potential vacation. Integrating (AR) It's (VR) into travel portal not only elevates the user experience but also drives engagement by offering something truly unique.
7. Customizable and Personalized Travel Packages
Personalization is key to standing out in the competitive travel industry. Travelers today expect customizable travel packages that cater to their unique need and preferences. From flight choices to hotel rooms, activities, It's local experiences, organization allows businesses to create tailored experiences that resonate with their customer.
Advanced travel portal use customer data to offer customized deal, travel itineraries, It's destination recommendations. By analyzing past booking behaviors It's preferences, businesses can deliver highly relevant options, thus increasing the likelihood of conversion. Offering dynamic packaging allows users to mix and match services based on their preferences, creating a more flexible It's customized booking experience.
8. Sustainability and Eco-Friendly Travel Options
As a coincidental concerns continue to rise, more travelers are becoming mindful of their carbon footprint. Sustainable travel has become a major trend in the tourism industry, It's businesses are responding by incorporating Eco-friendly options into their travel portal. Whether it’s booking Eco-conscious accommodations, flights with lower carbon emissions, or supporting local sustainable experiences, travelers are now seeking out environmentally responsible options.
Travel portals that emphasize sustainability and provide clear, detailed information about eco-friendly options are likely to attract a growing segment of conscientious travelers. Businesses can also promote their commitment to sustainability by partnering with Eco-friendly service providers and offering travelers the ability to offset their carbon emissions.
9. Integration with Social Media and User-Generated Content
Social media plays a pivotal role in travel decision making. More than ever, travelers are relying on user generated content (UGC) like reviews, photos, and videos from social platforms to guide their choices. Integrating (UGC) into travel portals allows businesses to tap into this social proof It's build trust with potential customer.
For instance, allowing users to share their experiences via social media or review platforms can provide valuable insights for other travelers. Additionally, incorporating social sharing features within the portals itself can encourage users to engage with your brand It's share their travel experiences, thereby driving more traffic to the portal.
10. API Integrations and Multi-Channel Distribution
As the travel landscape becomes more fragmented, travel businesses must offer a consistent experience across multiple channels. API integrations are key to ensuring that travel portals can access real-time data and distribute it across different platforms. APIs allow travel portal to integrate with global distribution system (GDS), airlines, hotels, car rental services, It's other travel-related services seamlessly.
By offering multi-channel distribution, business can maximize their reach, whether through desktop websites, mobile app, or third party platform like OTAs (Online Travel Agents). This integration also ensures real-time availability update It's better inventory management.
Source & Published by: https://www.namantechnolab.com/
➤「救いようが最もうない、極東の自称他称の〝ジャーナリスト〟や〝学者〟、〝知米派〟は読まなくても構い。読んでもその肥大化した自己承認欲求、度し難い自己愛性人格では読むことはできないし、理解もできない。ただ見下した目線で見やるだけで、そこに自分が利用できる素材がなければ鼻で嗤うだけだ。この文章は、我がU.S.を領りたい、領ろうと下向きの反省的眼光で欲する諸君に読んで貰いたい。
I Traveled to 46 States in America This Summer. Here’s Why Trump Won.
By Frank S. Zhou
By Ezekiel A. Wells
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27 is a Double Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in Eliot House. He spent last summer traveling to 46 American states conducting interviews for his YouTube series, “Crossroads America.”
A week after Democrats’ election loss, accusations have flown in every direction within their Party. Some fault President Joe Biden for an egoistic refusal to drop out of the race earlier. Some blame the Harris campaign for failing to serve key demographics and communicate a clear vision for the country. And some blame Americans, claiming that racism and sexism drove voters toward Trump.
These factors certainly exist, but we’re missing a larger piece of the picture.
Over the summer, I traveled to 46 states in the U.S., creating a YouTube series highlighting slices of life across the country. In conversations from my nearly three-month road trip, I spoke with Republicans who were certain that inflation is entirely Biden’s fault and Democrats who, despite their frustrations with corporate profits and desires for universal healthcare, hoped for a more moderate candidate. From supporters of all candidates, I heard a shocking amount of misinformation.
After combing through hundreds of hours of interview footage from swing state Trump voters, I am certain that, as much as other factors influenced the outcome of the election, our crumbling media landscape — which has caused a rift in our democracy — is most to blame.
In the postwar period, news was dominated by three main channels, and because of the Fairness Doctrine, each station reported the same stories and covered multiple sides of each issue. Viewers picked which channels they watched mainly based on their preferences for news anchors’ personalities. Of course, this model had its problems, but, at the end of the day, it meant that Americans worked with a shared set of facts.
A shared set of facts is not the world we live in today.
Throughout my interviews, conspiracy theories were rampant, and on at least five separate occasions across separate states, I was told that Bill Gates tampers with our food, adding plastic to our fruits and vegetables to make his medical investments more profitable.
In conversations with voters, neither side seemed able to name many specific policy issues they cared about; everyone just seemed to repeat the words of their favorite pundits, podcast hosts, and internet personalities.
Although this behavior is harmful, I don’t blame everyday Americans. Blame falls on the media that has ostracized, disillusioned, and misinformed them.
Advertisement
I first saw this trend with low-wage workers in West Virginia, who — despite falling inflation rates — have seen stagnated salaries and clear increases in food costs. Channels like Fox News bred anger and resentment for many of them.
Take July of this summer, for example, when for the first time in his presidency, prices actually fell under the Biden administration. Traditional media establishments rushed to celebrate this victory, with one article from CNN declaring, “The White House can finally cross out ‘inflation’ on its list of presidential liabilities.” However, outside these bubbles, I observed many Americans held a different view.
In late July, I was welcomed at a massive family reunion in Tylertown, Mississippi, where one Trump voter — a middle-aged, Black, family man, pastor, and soul food enthusiast — made this clear.
“When I go in the grocery stores, and I gotta spend my last to get groceries, you mean to tell me I’m not gonna look and see who’s gonna vote to help me? I voted for Trump and I’d vote for him again, because he put money in our pocket,” he told me.
In their coverage, mainstream news organizations obsess over the Federal Reserve’s next rate cuts while failing to connect with people concerned with their next meals. With titles like “Vance: Young Americans ‘Are Becoming Paupers’ Due To Inflation, High Housing Costs,” sites like The Daily Wire had their fingers on the pulse of American sentiment, welcoming new readership from those who felt neglected by traditional media.
This problem was not just confined to the economy. While Biden’s mental state was deteriorating, liberal media outlets seemed to under-cover these stories, sheltering him from scrutiny of his declining capabilities, until the infamous presidential debate.
Formerly trusted networks slowly made themselves indigestible to the polarized American public, and in 2024, for the third year in a row, a Gallup poll found that more Americans indicated having “no trust” in the media than those who trust it a “great deal/fair amount”.
So where does the average American turn when the nation’s media cannot be trusted? For many people, it was YouTube talk shows, Newsmax, and podcasters such as Joe Rogan.
While Democrats seek to blame various internal factors for this election’s loss, I cannot help but think of Joe Rogan’s Trump endorsement, the many blind lies I heard from ordinary citizens across the country, and declining trust in American journalism.
As Harvard students and members of higher education institutions, we have a part to play in the problem. At Harvard’s Institute of Politics, those who denied the 2020 election results have been precluded from speaking at the JFK Jr. Forum. While the goal is understandable, it shields students from understanding the American viewpoints they represent.
Advertisement
There is a difference between platforming intentional and manipulative misinformation and listening to and learning about where people are and what they believe.
As a pipeline to mainstream media, Harvard, and its future journalists, have to consider the audience they lose when they stay inside of their bubble and ignore the issues of everyday Americans.
The disappearance of factual importance in our world is alarming and dangerous, but if we, as aspiring journalists, politicians, and engaged citizens, want to be taken seriously in communicating Trump’s threat to democracy, inflationary tariff policies, and so on, we owe American voters that seriousness, too.
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27 is a Double Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in Eliot House. He spent last summer traveling to 46 American states conducting interviews for his YouTube series, “Crossroads America."
2024年11月10日 VOLA&THE ORIENTAL MACHINE/Lilles and Remains 「PLAY VOL.58」@池下CLUB UPSET
VOLAのライブを観るのは2019年にHINTOと下北で２マンやった時以来なので5年振り？リリーズと対バンなのめちゃくちゃ楽しみにしてた！名古屋と言う人入りがあまり良くない土地でライブしてくれる事に感謝。人もそこそこ入ってて良かった。
背が低いので段差上から観る事に。UPSETの規模とハコ的に何処で観ても観やすい·音も良い·入場もちゃんとしてるしで、名古屋で一番好きなハコ。唯一の難点は自分の好きなバンドは滅多にUPSETでやる事はないと言う事だけ…。
リリーズでも中畑さんが叩くとの事でより楽しみにしてたけど、期待以上の演奏でテンション上がる〜！！演奏上手〜！！！聴きたい曲も懐かしめの曲も沢山聴けて嬉しい。リリーズってMC全くない印象あって、でも普通に一杯喋ってたから私の記憶違いかと思ってたけど、やっぱり昔はカッコつけなきゃとかそっちの方が良いんじゃないかって思ってたからMCしてなかったってKENTさんが話してたから記憶は間違ってなかった。カッコつけるの無理、喋りたいとの事笑 と言うか普通にMC上手くて面白かった笑 バシバシ演奏していくので思ってたより沢山曲数聴けたし手数が多い系のドラムを叩く中畑さんを味わえて最高。
K「55分ぐらいまでだっけ？(演奏して良いリミット)」中「ちょっとくらい良いんじゃない？笑 先輩には俺から言っとくよぉ」K「それが怖いんですよ…笑」のやり取り面白かった。
K「ドラム2連チャンって中々ないので(中畑さんは)大変だと思う」中「大丈夫！…多分大丈夫！笑」K「手数多い曲選んどいたんで笑」中「笑」
メンバー紹介でsyrup16gとVOLA&THE ORIENTAL MACHINEの中畑さんって紹介があって何か嬉しい…。未だにシロップが再結成したと言う実感をこう言う所で味わっている…。
中村さんが終始ガチの真顔ですごいと思った笑 メンバー紹介あるまでずっとサングラスかけてたから表情読み取れないのかと思ったけど外しても真顔だった笑 中村さんとナツキさん、両方共めちゃくちゃ存在感あって素晴らしかったなぁ。また是非共ライブ観たい。
ぶっちゃけ書いちゃうとVOLAのライブに行かなくなった理由は楽曲云々もあるけど一番はギターが青木さんじゃなくなったってのが大きくて、アヒトさんがそんなにギタースキル高くない分青木さんのギターがあってこその世界観だったり音楽性が表現出来ると感じていたので…。久しぶりに観るボラは大前提に前見た時よりアヒトさんが元気そうで良かったなと思ったし、気合い入ってるのがす伝わってきた。新しい曲から古い曲まで満遍ないセットリストで、Mexico Pubの始まりはいつ聴いてもカッコ良い。あと中畑さんのLOVEが観れたの良き。昔は嫌悪感しかなかったけど…笑 コミケと夢診断も久しぶりに聴いたかも。でも昔の曲聴くとやっぱギター物足りんのよなぁ…申し訳ないけど…。
Dead or Danceの1.2.3.4をやる中畑さんも久しぶりに観れて嬉しい！昔は(ry 今はもう可愛いな〜としか思わなくなった笑 この曲でアヒトさんがフロアに降りてきてびっくりした。近くで観るアヒトさん、めちゃくちゃ痩せてたし顔小さかった笑
·アヒトさんがチューニングするから喋っててとの事で笑 残りのメンバーでMC。名古屋でボラが演奏するのが10年振りとの事。2014年の伏見JIMMIN'振りらしい。楢崎さんが物を無くしたって話とアヒトさんのギターか壊された話で中畑さんからアポロシアターと言う言葉が出で驚く。無くなっちゃったのかな？って話してて地方のライブハウスなのに詳しいし、中畑さん記憶力良すぎる…。個人的にはボラのライブって言ったらアポロシアターだったので懐かしい気持ちになった。
·アヒトさんが酔っ払って打ち上げの味仙で蛙の唐揚げをポケットに入れたまま帰宅し次の日めちゃくちゃ驚いたって話もしてた笑
·アヒトさんからのリクエストでビールで乾杯する。メンバーリクエストの銘柄なのか分からないけど、有江さんと中畑さんが交換してた笑(有江さんがアサヒスーパードライ、中畑さんが札幌黒ラベル？飲んでた)中畑さんもライブ中に缶ビール1杯ぐらいなら普通に飲める感じになったんだなぁ。(飲めるの)嬉し〜って喜んでた笑
·アヒトさんが3回目か4回目の人生でビール造りとかしてみたいって話から何て(名前の)ビールにします？って中畑さんが聞いて即答で「キチネコビール！」と答えるアヒトさん笑 こぶしの効いた和っぽいCM曲？みたいのを即興で歌った下りからテレビの話になり中畑さんが住んでた頃の青森は2局しか映らなかった(日テレとTBS)、高校生の頃にテレ朝が映るようになって初めてミュージックステーション見た(！？)と言う話に笑 信じられん…。
·お知らせがありまーすってアヒトさんが言ったら中畑さんが「なになにぃ〜？」って相槌打ってて可愛かった笑 来年大阪でonion Nightが開催されるとの事。歓喜の悲鳴上がってた笑 中畑さんが「是非来て〜」って言ってて拍手？起こってた。
·めちゃくちゃ楽しそうな中畑さん。偶に有江さんと目合わせて笑い合ってるのとても良い。有江さんは菩薩の笑みでフロアを見てた笑
·鯔のMC、中畑さんがめちゃくちゃ喋るのとアヒトさんの絶妙につまんない話(失礼過ぎる)と有江さんの高スキルMC力で軌道修正する感じがそうそうこんな感じだったなぁと思うなど。
·ただの悪口になっちゃうが、昔から感じてた気持ちを思い出したと言うかやっぱフロントマンのアヒトさんのテンション、割と苦手な部分もあり…。ボラのライブ観にいっといてなんだけど…。まぁアヒトさんが元気そうで、それだけで良かったなと思ったけど…。1月もVOLA予定してるのでその時観たらまた違う感想持てるかも…。
·Lilles and Remains
1.Like The Way We Were
2.Muted
3.Superior
4.Pass Me By
5.Body
6.The Fake
8.Some Girls
10.Moralist S.S.
12.Grind
·VOLA&THE ORIENTAL MACHINE
1.EMPIRE OF THE V O L A
2.THANK YOU MY FORCE
3.MAC-ROY
4.A communication refusal desire
5.夢診断
6.Fatal Incident
7.comeback in darkness
8.Mexico Pub
9.S.E.〜Self-Defense
E.N
まずCEDAWの報告書"Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women"の読み方です。
この報告書の本体ともいえる、"勧告"に関わる内容は"Principal areas of concern and recommendations"（主な懸念事項と勧告）というセクションにあります。
セクションの題名通り、懸念点を述べる→勧告するという流れで各項目について述べています。太字の方が勧告です。
懸念と勧告はセットなのですが、元増田さんは日本の勧告部分と他国の懸念部分を比較しているため、日本の方がきつく言われていると感じたのではないでしょうか。
例えば懸念パートと勧告パートを並べてみると以下のようになります。（日本vs韓国なので夫婦別姓関連）
日本（CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/9）：
11. ... The Committee also notes with concern that several of its previous recommendations regarding existing discriminatory provisions have not been addressed, in particular:
(a) That no steps have been taken to revise article 750 of the Civil Code requiring married couples to use the same surname, which in practice often compels women to adopt their husbands’ surnames; ...
11. ... 委員会はまた、既存の差別的な規定に関するこれまでの勧告のいくつか、特に以下に対処していないことにも懸念を持って留意している。
(a) 夫婦同姓を義務付ける民法第 750 条を改正するための措置が講じられていないこと。この条項は実質的に女性に夫の姓を強制することが多い。...
12. ..., the Committee also recommends that the State party:
(a) Amend legislation regarding the choice of surnames for married couples in order to enable women to retain their maiden surnames after marriage; ...
韓国（CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/9）：
52.The Committee remains concerned that article 781 (1) of the Civil Code maintains the patrilineal principle, as it stipulates that a child may assume the mother’s surname only when the father agrees to it at the time of marriage, despite the decision of the Constitutional Court overturning the Hoju system. ...
52. 委員会は、憲法裁判所が保寿制度を覆したにもかかわらず、民法第781条(1)が父系原則を維持していることを依然として懸念している。同条は、子が結婚時に父親の同意を得た場合にのみ、母親の姓を名乗ることができると規定している。...
53. The Committee calls upon the State party to amend article 781 (1) of the Civil Code to abolish the patrilineal principle in order to bring its laws into line with article 16 (1) (g) of the Convention. ...
53. 委員会は、締約国に対し、民法第781条第1項を改正し、父系原則を廃止して、同国の法律を女子差別撤廃条約条約第16条第1項(g)に沿わせるよう求める。...
「そうは言ってもcall（要求）とrecommend（勧告・推奨）は違うじゃん」と思われる方もいらっしゃるでしょう。
「日本が前に勧告された時はurge（要請）だったのだし、言葉遣いが違っても別に変らんのでは？」と言ってしまってもいいのかも知れませんが、それとは別に少しややこしい現実が存在しています。
ここまでで言及の無かったリヒテンシュタイン公国のことも含めて少し説明いたしましょう。
留保（りゅうほ）とは、国際法における制度で、国が多数国間条約について署名、批准、受諾、承認または加入をする際に、当該条約の特定の規定に関して自国についての適用を排除・変更する目的をもって行われる一方的宣言である。
女子差別撤廃条約条約では第28条で留保が規定されており、結構な数の国が留保をもって条約を批准しています。※
日本は留保なく全ての条項を受け入れていますが（素晴らしい！）、
韓国は第16条第1項(g)（「夫及び妻の同一の個人的権利（姓及び職業を選択する権利を含む。）」を確保する）を留保しており、
リヒテンシュタイン公国は条約全般（正確には第1条）についてリヒテンシュタイン憲法第3条（王位継承に関する規定）を優先することを条件に条約を批准しています。
※女子差別撤廃条約条約は他の国際条約と比較して留保が多すぎる（あとそれが無法すぎる）のが長年問題視されています。
というわけで、日本に対しては「条約違反（の恐れ）の是正勧告」なのですが、韓国やリヒテンシュタインに対しては「留保の撤回の勧告」なので、もしかしたら語気やニュアンスが違って感じられるかもしれませんね。
ついでにリヒテンシュタインは留保に関して報告書中で1回しか勧告されてないのですが、
Reservations
9.While respecting the legal sovereignty of the State party to freely decide who should be its Head of State, the Committee is concerned that the persistent exclusion of women from succession to the throne affects the implementation of the Convention as a whole in the State party.
9.委員会は、締約国が国家元首を誰にするかを自由に決定する法的主権を尊重する一方で、女性が王位継承から排除され続けていることが、締約国における条約全体の実施に影響を及ぼすことを懸念する。
10. Reiterating its previous concern (CEDAW/C/LIE/CO/4 , para. 13), the Committee reminds the State party that it considers the reservation to article 1 of the Convention to be in contravention of the Convention and calls upon the State party to review its reservation, with a view to its withdrawal.
10. 委員会は、前回の懸念（CEDAW/C/LIE/CO/4、第13項）を繰り返し、締約国に対し、条約第1条に対する留保は条約に違反していると考えていることを想起し、留保の撤回を視野に入れて留保を見直すよう求める。
韓国の方はReservationsの項で1回勧告された後、Marriage and family relationsの項でもう1回勧告（さっき例示したやつです）されています。
Reservations
8.The Committee remains concerned that the State party maintains its reservation to article 16 (1) (g) of the Convention.
8.委員会は、締約国が条約第16条(1)(g)に対する留保を維持していることを引き続き懸念する。
9. The Committee recalls its previous recommendation ( CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/8 , para. 9) and its statement on reservations, adopted at its nineteenth session, in 1998, and considers that the reservation to article 16 (1) (g) of the Convention is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and that it should be withdrawn.
9. 委員会は、前回の勧告（CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/8、第9項）及び1998年の第19回会期で採択された留保に関する声明を鑑み、条約第16条(1)(g)に対する留保は条約の趣旨及び目的に反しており、撤回されるべきであると考える。
【追記】有識者増田が解説してくれました！元増田（俺）の疑問は誤読のせいでした……。韓国にもリヒテンシュタインにもちゃんと勧告してたよ～。すまない……。
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20241030193225 ←みんなこっち読んで～！！
選択的夫婦別姓はさっさとやればいいし天皇が男系男子かどうかはどうでもいいけど、外から偉そうにご指南されるとムカつく！
いきなりイエロー差別かよ？ ヨーロッパリらしいな……とイラついたので調べてみました。とりあえずブコメに出てた韓国（強制別姓）とリヒテンシュタイン（男系男子継承）だけ。
・国連は韓国の「父系主義」とリヒテンシュタインの「男系男子限定継承」にも懸念を表明している
・でも「懸念」だけだから、日本の皇室典範改正・選択的夫婦別姓導入への「勧告」よりかなり当たりが柔らかいよ
→【追記】有識増田が解説してくれました！「懸念」と「勧告」がセットなのを見落としていたらしい、俺は無能……
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20241030193225
まず、日本に対する「最終勧告」のソースはこれ。第9回報告審査に対する女子差別撤廃委員会最終見解ってやつ。外務省のページにはそのうち仮訳が載るだろうけど、まだ出来立てほやほやだから国連のページにも英語のDocxファイルしか載っていない。そのうち各公用語版の文書が出るはず。
皇位継承については、「継承法を改正した他の締約国を見習って皇室典範を改正しな～」と勧告している。該当部分のGoogle翻訳は以下：
「委員会は、男女平等を確保するため皇位継承法を改正した他の締約国の優れた実践例を参考にし、皇位継承における男女平等を保障するために皇室典範を改正するよう締約国に勧告する。（The Committee recommends that the State party look at good practices of other States parties that have reformed their succession laws to ensure equality of women and men, and amend the Imperial House Law to guarantee equality of women and men in the succession to the throne.）」
外務省はこの最終報告書の前に「皇室典範に定める我が国の皇位継承の在り方は、国家の基本に関わる事項である。女性に対する差別の撤廃を目的とする本条約の趣旨に照らし、委員会が我が国の皇室典範について取り上げることは適当ではない。」って意見してるのに、結局勧告されちゃってる。ていうか「日本さぁ……他国を見習いな？ｗ」って言われてる。
この報告書では選択的夫婦別姓も「勧告」されてるけど、まぁ皇室典範に比べれば些事だと思うんで各自確認してください。
韓国への最新の勧告はこれ。夫婦強制別姓については、「子どもが母親の姓を名乗れるかどうかに父親の同意が必要」で「父系主義」なことに懸念があると言っていて、「妻が夫の姓を名乗れない」という問題の立て方ではない。
これは「懸念」止まりであって、対日本と違って法改正を「勧告」してない。なんで？日和るなよ！
「委員会は、憲法裁判所が戸主制度を覆したにもかかわらず、民法第781条第1項が、結婚時に父親が同意した場合にのみ子どもが母親の姓を名乗ることができると規定しており、父系主義を維持していることに引き続き懸念を抱いている。（The Committee remains concerned that article 781 (1) of the Civil Code maintains the patrilineal principle, as it stipulates that a child may assume the mother’s surname only when the father agrees to it at the time of marriage, despite the decision of the Constitutional Court overturning the Hoju system. ）」
リヒテンシュタインはこれ。男系男子だけが公位を継承できることに一応「懸念」を表明してる。
「委員会は、誰が国家元首となるべきかを自由に決定する締約国の法的主権を尊重する一方で、女性が公位継承から排除され続けていることが、締約国における条約全体の実施に影響を及ぼすことを懸念している。（While respecting the legal sovereignty of the State party to freely decide who should be its Head of State, the Committee is concerned that the persistent exclusion of women from succession to the throne affects the implementation of the Convention as a whole in the State party.）」
これなんて「懸念」止まりなのもさることながら、日本と違って「国家元首を自由に決める国家主権は尊重しますけど……」なんて譲歩も入れてる。天皇を自由に決める主権も尊重してくれ～～！！（アイリスアウト） あれ、そもそも天皇って元首なんだっけ？
国連くん、他国の問題がある制度にも言及はしている。言及はしているが、少なくともこの3か国だと、なんか日本にだけ当たりがキツい。「2016年の前回報告から改善されてない！」というお怒りがあるのかもしれないが、委員会報告書にも明記してある通り、婚姻年齢の引き上げやら不同意性交罪の制定やら、改善点も一応あるんだけどな。
なんでこんなことになってるんすかね？ 国連が悪いの？ 日本が外交下手なの？ 有識者がいたら教えてほしい。韓国と比べても当たりがキツいってことは、単なるヨーロッパリの黄色差別ではないのだろうが……。
とりあえず「サム・アルトマンがヒントンの教え子」というとんでもない認識違いは改めてくれ
http://finalvent.cocolog-nifty.com/fareastblog/2024/10/post-21c158.html
OpenAI創業メンバーのサツケヴァーがヒントンの教え子で、AI悪用を懸念したうえで、
アルトマン追い出し計画を褒めた(具体的にサツケヴァーの名前は出さなかったが)というのがインタビューの内容
I'm particularly proud of the fact that one of my students fired Sam Altman.
https://youtu.be/H7DgMFqrON0?t=212
はてブやってないしSNSアカウントも持ってないから、誰か本人に伝えておいてくれ
(それにしてもブクバカ誰も指摘しないんだな...)