[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix handling of .pom files with multiple license declarations #88

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2019

Conversation

rfk
Copy link
Contributor
@rfk rfk commented Sep 9, 2019

Fixes #6.

I've included a testcase that failed before the change and passes afterward. I don't really understand all the nuances of the test setup here so please let me know if this could be done better.

@colintheshots
Copy link

Thanks @rfk. We definitely want to see this PR make it into a release. I'll help in any way I can if any fixes are needed.

@googlebot
Copy link

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@rfk
Copy link
Contributor Author
rfk commented Sep 20, 2019

(The CLA weirdess above was because I used github's web-based "update branch" merge button, which made a new commit under my default email address that doesn't have a CLA. I've fixed it by rebasing with proper author info).

@zhiqiao could you please help us figure out the next steps here?

Copy link
Member
@aaronj1335 aaronj1335 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ran the tests locally using Java 1.8 and the Gradle wrapper, and got all 40 tests passing (up from 39).

@aaronj1335 aaronj1335 merged commit 4e19991 into google:master Sep 24, 2019
@vladikoff
Copy link

Thanks Aaron!!! 🎆

@aaronj1335
Copy link
Member

I'll file an issue to release a new version. I'm not familiar with that process, so I'll chat with some team members in the morning!

@aaronj1335 aaronj1335 mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2019
@aaronj1335
Copy link
Member

@vladikoff
Copy link
vladikoff commented Oct 10, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Wrong counting of licenses in groovy
5 participants