User contributions for Masem
Appearance
A user with 184,197 edits. Account created on 12 February 2006.
18 June 2024
- 16:2016:20, 18 June 2024 diff hist +1,458 988 (telephone number) Reverted good faith edits by 152.132.11.10 (talk): Seems very relevant current Tags: Twinkle Undo
- 16:1916:19, 18 June 2024 diff hist +123 Nintendo Switch Reverted good faith edits by Blaze Wolf (talk): This is in the successor console section current Tags: Twinkle Undo
- 16:1516:15, 18 June 2024 diff hist −3 Balatro (video game) Reverted good faith edits by 2001:A62:192A:4F01:43B9:8AE3:7321:38F2 (talk): Unless LOVE is an initialism, we use normal sentence cass current Tags: Twinkle Undo
- 11:2411:24, 18 June 2024 diff hist +213 New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen →Impact current
17 June 2024
- 22:2322:23, 17 June 2024 diff hist +298 Talk:Twitter under Elon Musk →What on earth is going on with the Twitter and X (social network) pages: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:5719:57, 17 June 2024 diff hist +1,301 SimCity (1989 video game) →Super Nintendo: may beore from this book current
- 18:0618:06, 17 June 2024 diff hist +742 Wikipedia talk:In the news →Should RD’s have their own section separate from the In the News section?: @Trauma Novitiate "RD moms (not blurbs) tend to fall into t..." [Factotum]
- 13:5713:57, 17 June 2024 diff hist +563 Wikipedia talk:In the news →Should RD’s have their own section separate from the In the News section?: @Trauma Novitiate "This has been proposed before and has fa..." [Factotum]
- 00:2900:29, 17 June 2024 diff hist +601 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →When can titles contain "massacre"?
16 June 2024
- 21:0121:01, 16 June 2024 diff hist +5 Eddy Goldfarb →Career as an inventor
- 21:0021:00, 16 June 2024 diff hist +123 Eddy Goldfarb →Career as an inventor
- 18:4618:46, 16 June 2024 diff hist +441 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Why does Wikipedia appear to take sides?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:4116:41, 16 June 2024 diff hist +1,249 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Why does Wikipedia appear to take sides?: @Dominic Mayers "You seem to be the only editor here that..." [Factotum]
- 15:4715:47, 16 June 2024 diff hist +639 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Why does Wikipedia appear to take sides?: @Dominic Mayers "We are trying to help you understand tha..." [Factotum]
- 12:2912:29, 16 June 2024 diff hist −265 FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine Reverted good faith edits by AstonMartin28 (talk): Unsourced and opinionated Tags: Twinkle Undo
- 02:2002:20, 16 June 2024 diff hist +600 Wikipedia talk:In the news →Blurb versus Recent Death: Jim Brown, Jerry West, Bill Russell: @Muboshgu "The bias in blurbs introduces with !vote..." [Factotum]
15 June 2024
- 23:1323:13, 15 June 2024 diff hist +125 Wordle Reverted good faith edits by Quangson306 (talk): May not be as accessible as simple image Tags: Twinkle Undo
- 23:1223:12, 15 June 2024 diff hist +389 Wikipedia talk:In the news →Blurb versus Recent Death: Jim Brown, Jerry West, Bill Russell: @Muboshgu "That creates an immediate bias towards p..." [Factotum]
- 20:1920:19, 15 June 2024 diff hist +1,037 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Please air your Rfc question first: @Dominic Mayers "this sounds like you want us to reconsid..." [Factotum]
- 18:4618:46, 15 June 2024 diff hist +330 Garland v. Cargill →Reactions
- 17:3017:30, 15 June 2024 diff hist −86 Garland v. Cargill →Supreme Court: same, we don't identify associate
- 17:2817:28, 15 June 2024 diff hist −10 Garland v. Cargill →Prior legal history: don't typically identy associate justices, just the chief
- 17:2717:27, 15 June 2024 diff hist +83 Garland v. Cargill →Prior legal history: the legality over the final rule, specifically
- 17:2517:25, 15 June 2024 diff hist +1 Garland v. Cargill →top: fornat
- 17:2317:23, 15 June 2024 diff hist +117 Talk:Dune (1984 film) No edit summary current
- 17:1417:14, 15 June 2024 diff hist +287 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Proposal of a RFC about a better unification of include-info and reject-info principles: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:1117:11, 15 June 2024 diff hist +1,036 Wikipedia talk:In the news →We don't have a minimum death criterion... but should we?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:0217:02, 15 June 2024 diff hist +25,061 List of songs in Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock Reverted good faith edits by Handsintheair1 (talk): Why change Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
- 15:1315:13, 15 June 2024 diff hist +461 Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates →2024 Kasai River disaster: @Chaotic Enby "Clearly even now the Bangui article is w..." [Factotum]
- 15:1115:11, 15 June 2024 diff hist −3 Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates →2024 Kasai River disaster: rm ongoing (at this point)
- 15:0915:09, 15 June 2024 diff hist +819 Garland v. Cargill →Prior legal history: that name gets me an addition source and some added details
- 14:5914:59, 15 June 2024 diff hist +342 Wikipedia talk:In the news →Archive of ITN postings (redux): @Thryduulf "You'd probably need to ask who was the o..." [Factotum]
- 14:5314:53, 15 June 2024 diff hist −113 Garland v. Cargill →Reactions: rm coat racking statements
- 14:5014:50, 15 June 2024 diff hist +1,129 Talk:Garland v. Cargill →Avoid using the decision text directly: new section [Factotum] current
- 14:4614:46, 15 June 2024 diff hist +40 Garland v. Cargill →Background: section break
- 14:4514:45, 15 June 2024 diff hist +112 Garland v. Cargill →Reactions: third party source for Biden's stance
- 14:4114:41, 15 June 2024 diff hist −34 Garland v. Cargill →Supreme Court: rm dup
- 14:4114:41, 15 June 2024 diff hist −36 Garland v. Cargill →Supreme Court: no need for this to be a ref, this template is meant to be inline
- 14:4014:40, 15 June 2024 diff hist +18 Garland v. Cargill →Supreme Court
- 14:3914:39, 15 June 2024 diff hist −274 Garland v. Cargill rm this, sourced directly to the decision (we need 3rd party sources)
- 14:3814:38, 15 June 2024 diff hist −4 Garland v. Cargill fix broken refs
- 14:3714:37, 15 June 2024 diff hist −1 m Garland v. Cargill →Supreme Court
- 14:3714:37, 15 June 2024 diff hist +308 Garland v. Cargill →Supreme Court: rework one source back to here
- 14:3514:35, 15 June 2024 diff hist +2,480 Garland v. Cargill incorporate addition material from concurrence, dissent, and reaction material
- 14:3114:31, 15 June 2024 diff hist −3,315 Garland v. Cargill →Background: better sourcing and expansion. I will review the intermediate changes but they still appear problematic
- 14:0214:02, 15 June 2024 diff hist +1,653 Garland v. Cargill →Background: this section was fine but need source for def
- 14:0014:00, 15 June 2024 diff hist +2,359 Garland v. Cargill →Supreme Court: that reason article helps to identify the high level of Thomas' points on definition of machine-gun vs function of bump stock
- 13:4513:45, 15 June 2024 diff hist +1,862 Garland v. Cargill →Supreme Court: the first para of the reactions was fine, but we should not use WH press releases, and we absolutely cannot use Fox News per RSP.
- 13:4213:42, 15 June 2024 diff hist +82 Garland v. Cargill →top
- 13:4013:40, 15 June 2024 diff hist −49 Garland v. Cargill →top: fix edge