[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Statutory interpretation: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

3 June 2024

2 June 2024

9 May 2024

16 April 2024

13 April 2024

4 April 2024

23 March 2024

16 February 2024

21 January 2024

11 January 2024

28 December 2023

21 December 2023

1 December 2023

27 July 2023

24 July 2023

25 June 2023

1 June 2023

24 April 2023

17 April 2023

14 April 2023

11 March 2023

31 January 2023

20 December 2022

19 December 2022

25 November 2022

24 November 2022

3 November 2022

11 October 2022

5 October 2022

10 August 2022

3 August 2022

5 July 2022

3 July 2022

28 June 2022

  • curprev 20:2520:25, 28 June 2022Xavdeman talk contribs 50,029 bytes +405 →‎General principles: Added nuance to the section on the so-called 'three rules', note that Cross, mentioned above, in his preface to Statutory Interpretation wrote: "Each and every pupil told me that there were three rules—the literal rule, the golden rule and the mischief rule, and that the Courts invoke whichever is believed to do justice in the particular case. I had, and still have, my doubts (...)" undo

1 May 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)