Supreme Court

This is what happens after four years under an insurrectionist president. It will get much worse if he gets eight.

The justices are quietly quitting their day jobs as judges, even as they become more and more political.

It’s unclear if the Court will explicitly hold that Trump could commit crimes with impunity, or if they’ll just delay his trial so long that it doesn’t matter.

The justices already effectively gave Trump what he wants in his Supreme Court immunity case.

The fight over “ghost guns” is back before the justices.

But it’s not yet clear they’ve settled on a rationale for doing so.

Grants Pass v. Johnson is probably going to end badly for homeless people, but it’s not yet clear how broad the Court’s decision will be.

This case is about delaying his trial, and the GOP-controlled Supreme Court has given him everything he could reasonably hope for and more.

This week, the justices will hear the biggest case on homelessness in decades.

Grants Pass v. Johnson could make the entire criminal justice system far crueler. It also tests the limits of judicial power.

Most of the justices seem to want to make it harder to prosecute January 6 rioters.

The Court mostly reinstates Idaho’s ban on transgender health care for children.

It is no longer safe to organize a protest in Louisiana, Mississippi, or Texas.

A federal law requires hospitals to provide abortions when necessary to prevent serious health consequences. The justices could neutralize that law.

Simmering tensions between traditionalist Republican judges and MAGA judges are starting to boil over.

The lawsuit challenging mifepristone should have never been heard by any court.

The Court’s decision could potentially undermine over 300 January 6 prosecutions, including Trump’s.

The stakes in the Supreme Court’s mifepristone case go way beyond abortion.

It is hard to believe that Justice Amy Coney Barrett actually agrees with her own opinion.

The Supreme Court’s center right appears increasingly frustrated with the judiciary’s far right.

This is a serious blow to the First Amendment and a victory for a notoriously anti-LGBTQ judge.

The federal judiciary’s new rules target “judge shopping.” That’s terrible news for Matthew Kacsmaryk and other partisan judges.

Texas Republicans are trying to rewrite the Constitution — and this Supreme Court could let them.

It’s one of two cases asking whether the government is allowed to speak freely to private companies.

With courts coming for abortion and IVF, it’s hard not to wonder what the Supreme Court will go after next.

No one is coming to save US democracy, except for ourselves.

This is the second major victory the Supreme Court handed Trump in less than one week.

Say goodbye to the GOP leader, but not the all-powerful Supreme Court that is his legacy.

So much for the rule of law.

Most of the justices appeared uncomfortable with “bump stocks,” devices that allow semiautomatic weapons to fire automatically.

The justices look likely to reinstate Texas and Florida laws that seize control of much of the internet — but not for long.

Did Alabama’s Supreme Court just ban IVF treatments?

In a dissenting opinion, Alito takes a potshot at Bush’s signature racial justice program.

Garland v. Cargill asks whether gun makers can evade the ban on machine guns with a device called a bump stock.

We’re about to find out if the Supreme Court still believes in capitalism.

Trump wants the justices to delay his election theft trial forever.

Trump’s Supreme Court lawyer was a disaster, and it won’t matter one bit.

The Court’s GOP-appointed majority is very likely to rule for Trump. But it also matters how they rule for Trump.