What is the best way to prioritize problems for R&D design thinking?
R&D design thinking is a creative and user-centric approach to solving complex problems and generating innovative solutions. It involves empathizing with the needs and challenges of the customers, defining the problem clearly and accurately, ideating multiple possible solutions, prototyping and testing them, and iterating based on feedback and learning. But how do you decide which problem to focus on and prioritize among the many that you might encounter? Here are some tips to help you choose the most important and relevant problems for R&D design thinking.
The first step is to identify the core problem that you are trying to solve, not the symptoms or the solutions. A core problem is the root cause of the pain or frustration that your customers experience, and it is usually related to their goals, needs, or desires. To find the core problem, you need to ask why repeatedly until you reach the underlying reason. For example, if your customers complain that your product is too slow, you need to ask why it is slow, why that matters to them, and what they are trying to achieve with your product.
-
Javier Ahuir Torres
Market access lead Iberia at Horizon Therapeutics
I believe that correctly identifying the problem is the cornerstone, because the usual tendency is to confuse the symptom with the disease.
The next step is to evaluate the problem based on its impact, feasibility, and alignment. Impact refers to how much the problem affects your customers and your business, and how much value you can create by solving it. Feasibility refers to how realistic and achievable it is to solve the problem with your available resources, skills, and technology. Alignment refers to how well the problem fits with your vision, mission, and strategy, and how it supports your long-term goals. You can use a simple matrix or a scoring system to rank the problems based on these criteria.
-
Javier Ahuir Torres
Market access lead Iberia at Horizon Therapeutics
It is key to clearly identify the resources we need to make available to solve the problem. Both in what resources we need and how much resources we need. But we must be prepared for the associated costs of solving the problem because I believe that there is no worse symptom than leaving a problem half solved.
The third step is to involve your stakeholders in the prioritization process. Stakeholders are the people who have a direct or indirect interest in the problem and the solution, such as your customers, users, employees, partners, investors, or competitors. You can use various methods to gather their input, such as interviews, surveys, focus groups, workshops, or feedback sessions. By involving stakeholders, you can gain different perspectives, insights, and opinions, as well as validate your assumptions and hypotheses.
-
Javier Ahuir Torres
Market access lead Iberia at Horizon Therapeutics
A common problem is that we do not take into account the opinions of everyone involved so we create unsatisfactory solutions. This generates great frustration and the belief that we do not really want to solve the problem.
The final step is to define the scope of the problem that you want to address with R&D design thinking. The scope is the boundary or the limit of the problem, and it helps you to focus on the most essential and relevant aspects of it. To define the scope, you need to specify what is included and what is excluded from the problem, as well as the assumptions and constraints that you have. You can use tools like problem statements, problem frames, or how might we questions to articulate the scope clearly and concisely.
By following these steps, you can prioritize problems for R&D design thinking more effectively and efficiently. You can also revisit and revise your priorities as you learn more about the problem and the solution through the design thinking process.
-
Javier Ahuir Torres
Market access lead Iberia at Horizon Therapeutics
We must always look for the most efficient and realistic way to solve the problems we may encounter without being afraid to assume that we may be wrong or that we must reformulate the solutions to adjust to reality.
-
Javier Ahuir Torres
Market access lead Iberia at Horizon Therapeutics
In my life I have seen many times how wrong solutions have been taken that have led to a feeling that either the problem was not wanted to be solved or that it was more important to pretend that something was being done than the problem itself. All this leads to frustration on the part of both employees and customers.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Process DesignHow can you overcome resistance to change in process design using design thinking?
-
Product DevelopmentHow can you manage risk and uncertainty in design thinking?
-
Business InnovationHow do you use divergent and convergent thinking to generate innovative solutions?
-
Creativity SkillsHow can design thinking help you to solve problems as a leader?