What are the most effective conflict resolution strategies for strategic leaders in Business Administration?
Conflict is inevitable in any organization, especially when strategic decisions have to be made that affect the vision, mission, goals, and values of the business. However, conflict can also be a source of creativity, innovation, and learning if handled effectively by strategic leaders. In this article, you will learn about some of the most effective conflict resolution strategies for strategic leaders in Business Administration, and how they can help you foster a positive and productive organizational culture.
The first step in resolving any conflict is to identify its source and type. There are different sources of conflict, such as personality differences, communication breakdowns, resource scarcity, power struggles, or conflicting interests. Likewise, there are different types of conflict, such as task conflict, relationship conflict, or process conflict. Each source and type of conflict requires a different approach and level of intervention from the strategic leader. For example, task conflict can be beneficial if it stimulates constructive debate and problem-solving, while relationship conflict can be detrimental if it leads to personal attacks and emotional stress.
-
In my experience managing conflict within the workplace, identifying the root cause of conflict is crucial to prescribe a solution. For example, you may notice that a lot of conflicts are stemming from miscommunication, in which case you may develop an effective communication process to resolve the issue for the long-haul.
The second step in resolving any conflict is to choose an appropriate conflict management style that suits the situation and the desired outcome. There are five main conflict management styles, according to the Thomas-Kilmann model: competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating. Each style has its advantages and disadvantages, depending on the level of assertiveness and cooperativeness of the parties involved. For example, competing can be effective if the issue is urgent and important, while collaborating can be effective if the issue is complex and requires mutual understanding and creativity.
-
Depending on the complexity and severity of the conflict, adopting the right management style is key to have an effective outcome. For example, I've had to deal with complex issues that involved multiple parties, in which case collaborating to see each parties' perspective proved to be the most effective management style.
The third step in resolving any conflict is to apply effective communication and negotiation skills that can facilitate dialogue, understanding, and agreement. Communication skills include active listening, empathizing, clarifying, summarizing, and giving feedback. Negotiation skills include identifying interests, generating options, evaluating alternatives, and reaching consensus. These skills can help the strategic leader to build rapport, trust, and respect with the conflicting parties, and to address the underlying needs, concerns, and expectations of each side.
The fourth step in resolving any conflict is to seek third-party assistance if needed. Sometimes, the conflict may be too complex, intense, or entrenched for the strategic leader to handle alone, and may require the involvement of a neutral and impartial mediator, arbitrator, or facilitator. These third-party experts can help the strategic leader to create a safe and constructive space for dialogue, to manage the emotions and dynamics of the conflict, and to guide the parties towards a mutually acceptable resolution.
-
As leaders we need to recognize when we have taken all the steps to manage and the conflict goes beyond our scope due to it's sensitive complicated nature. I know in the past, I have had to involve a third-party and that made all the difference.
The fifth step in resolving any conflict is to implement and monitor the resolution. Once the parties have reached an agreement, the strategic leader should ensure that it is clear, realistic, and actionable, and that it is communicated and documented properly. The strategic leader should also monitor the implementation of the resolution, and provide feedback, support, and recognition to the parties involved. The strategic leader should also evaluate the effectiveness of the resolution, and learn from the experience to prevent or minimize future conflicts.
-
The most important yet most forgotten step of conflict resolution is the follow-up. Once you've implemented the solution, monitoring it and providing adequate feedback and support validates the work everyone has been putting in to resolve it. Additionally, the team learns through the process.
The sixth and final step in resolving any conflict is to promote a culture of constructive conflict that encourages diversity, collaboration, and learning. The strategic leader should model and reinforce positive behaviors and attitudes towards conflict, such as openness, respect, curiosity, and flexibility. The strategic leader should also create opportunities and mechanisms for constructive conflict, such as regular feedback, brainstorming, debriefing, and team-building. The strategic leader should also celebrate and reward the achievements and innovations that result from constructive conflict, and use them to enhance the strategic performance and direction of the business.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Leadership DevelopmentWhat are some team building assessment tools that focus on conflict resolution?
-
Conflict ManagementHow can organizational culture affect conflict resolution?
-
Change ManagementWhat are effective conflict management styles for team members with different personalities?
-
Executive CoachingWhat are the best conflict management strategies for leaders?