How can you report meta-analysis results clearly?
Meta-analysis is a powerful statistical tool that can synthesize the results of multiple studies on a topic and provide a more accurate estimate of the effect size and heterogeneity. However, reporting meta-analysis results clearly and transparently is essential for the readers to understand and evaluate the quality and validity of the meta-analysis. In this article, you will learn some tips and guidelines on how to report meta-analysis results clearly.
The first step in reporting meta-analysis results is to define the research question and the inclusion criteria for selecting the studies. The research question should be specific, relevant, and answerable, and it should follow the PICO format: population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. The inclusion criteria should be based on the research question and the scope of the meta-analysis, and they should be clearly stated and justified. You should also explain how you searched for, screened, and extracted the data from the studies, and report any potential sources of bias or conflict of interest.
-
Here are some thoughts: We could create interactive forest plots that allow readers to hover over data points for additional information. This can include displaying study details, effect sizes, confidence intervals, and more when the mouse cursor hovers over a specific data point. Try presenting the results using color-coded heatmaps. This can help readers quickly identify patterns, such as which interventions have the most significant effects or which subgroups show variations in effect sizes. Design infographics that tell a story about your meta-analysis. Use visuals, icons, and concise text to guide readers through the key findings, methodological details, and implications in an engaging and memorable way.
The next step in reporting meta-analysis results is to describe the characteristics of the studies that were included in the meta-analysis. You should provide a summary table or a flow diagram that shows the number of studies, participants, and outcomes that were included and excluded at each stage of the selection process. You should also report the main features of the studies, such as the design, setting, population, intervention, comparison, outcome, duration, and quality. You should highlight any similarities and differences among the studies, and any factors that may influence the generalizability or applicability of the results.
The third step in reporting meta-analysis results is to present the meta-analysis results in a clear and concise way. You should use appropriate graphical and numerical methods to display the effect sizes, confidence intervals, heterogeneity, and publication bias of the meta-analysis. You should also explain the choice of the statistical model, the method of pooling the data, the assessment of heterogeneity, and the evaluation of publication bias. You should interpret the results in relation to the research question and the existing literature, and discuss the strength of the evidence, the limitations, and the implications.
The fourth step in reporting meta-analysis results is to report the sensitivity and subgroup analyses that were performed to test the robustness and consistency of the meta-analysis results. Sensitivity analysis is a method of examining how the meta-analysis results change when different assumptions or parameters are used, such as excluding low-quality studies, using different effect measures, or applying different statistical models. Subgroup analysis is a method of exploring how the meta-analysis results vary across different subgroups of studies or participants, such as by age, gender, or intervention type. You should report the results of these analyses and explain how they affect the overall conclusions of the meta-analysis.
The fifth step in reporting meta-analysis results is to provide a summary of findings table that summarizes the main results and the quality of evidence for each outcome of interest. A summary of findings table is a useful way of presenting the key information for decision-making and communication, and it should follow the GRADE approach: grading the quality of evidence, reporting the effect size and the confidence interval, assessing the relative and absolute effects, describing the benefits and harms, and explaining the assumptions and uncertainties. You should use a standardized format and language to create the summary of findings table, and include it in the main text or the appendix of the meta-analysis report.
The sixth and final step in reporting meta-analysis results is to follow the PRISMA guidelines, which are a set of standards and recommendations for conducting and reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The PRISMA guidelines consist of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram that cover the essential elements of a meta-analysis report, such as the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references. You should use the PRISMA checklist and flow diagram as a guide and a tool to ensure that your meta-analysis report is complete, transparent, and reproducible.