Una nadadora olímpica escapa de un hogar abusivo con beca en Texas. Tras perderla por adicción, estudia con Kesey en Oregon. Mediante escritura, familia y autodescubrimiento, supera su pasad... Leer todoUna nadadora olímpica escapa de un hogar abusivo con beca en Texas. Tras perderla por adicción, estudia con Kesey en Oregon. Mediante escritura, familia y autodescubrimiento, supera su pasado.Una nadadora olímpica escapa de un hogar abusivo con beca en Texas. Tras perderla por adicción, estudia con Kesey en Oregon. Mediante escritura, familia y autodescubrimiento, supera su pasado.
- Director/a
- Guionistas
- Estrellas
- Premios
- 4 premios y 11 nominaciones en total
Alexander Johnson
- Assistant Coach
- (as Alexander M. Johnson)
- Director/a
- Guionistas
- Todo el reparto y equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
6,5640
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Reseñas destacadas
A trippy miss
There ended up being no Q&A because of unexpected travel issues, which was a bummer, I was looking forward to it. I'm a fan of Imogen Poots, and I was curious to see what Kristen Stewart would be like behind the camera. I kind of think of her in the same category as Jesse Eisenberg, actor whose directorial debuts interest me, and I thought her film would do the same.
This was actually my first time at the Angelika Theatre. The auditorium we were in was pretty small. The auditorium size didn't bother me, not the smallest I've been in, but the seats were a problem. I had to squeeze into them, and it was uncomfortable enough that I'll probably avoid screenings in that room if I can.
As for the movie itself, I found it unnecessarily experimental to its own detriment. Very trippy, very stylized. While it ambitiously tackles heavy themes like trauma, abuse, amorosity and addiction(felt like a project Stewart would naturally tackle), its trippy style felt overdone and poorly executed. The film dragged and often felt like it was trying really hard to appear bold or whatever but instead I found myself fighting boredom.
Maybe it lands better if you relate personally to the characters and what they're going through. The acting was alright but the filmmaking choices weren't for me. I never felt invested in the characters or her journey. The constant stylistic choices overshadowed the story, which could have been told better in a more straightforward manner. I didn't realize it was autobiographical going in, and the narrative choices made it a strange approach for a personal story.
I can imagine some people liking it, but I walked out with the same feeling I had after "I Saw the TV Glow(2024)". Totally different films, but they share that vibe of being gimmicky to me, trying to be more profound than they actually are, and in the end kinda boring.
This was actually my first time at the Angelika Theatre. The auditorium we were in was pretty small. The auditorium size didn't bother me, not the smallest I've been in, but the seats were a problem. I had to squeeze into them, and it was uncomfortable enough that I'll probably avoid screenings in that room if I can.
As for the movie itself, I found it unnecessarily experimental to its own detriment. Very trippy, very stylized. While it ambitiously tackles heavy themes like trauma, abuse, amorosity and addiction(felt like a project Stewart would naturally tackle), its trippy style felt overdone and poorly executed. The film dragged and often felt like it was trying really hard to appear bold or whatever but instead I found myself fighting boredom.
Maybe it lands better if you relate personally to the characters and what they're going through. The acting was alright but the filmmaking choices weren't for me. I never felt invested in the characters or her journey. The constant stylistic choices overshadowed the story, which could have been told better in a more straightforward manner. I didn't realize it was autobiographical going in, and the narrative choices made it a strange approach for a personal story.
I can imagine some people liking it, but I walked out with the same feeling I had after "I Saw the TV Glow(2024)". Totally different films, but they share that vibe of being gimmicky to me, trying to be more profound than they actually are, and in the end kinda boring.
Sloppy first feauture
I'm just back from Deauville where I had the chance to watch a few premieres including this one. And let's get a few things out of the way. I love Kristen Stewart , I'm also queer and feminist, I also have experienced abused and addiction and so I feel like I have a lot of empathy for those topics. Lastly, I am as well completely in love with Imogen Poots and feel like she has yet to have roles align with her talents.
I usually appreciate biopic and drama and as much as I really appreciate how the character grow and what she is going through the directing and editing were atrocious. Let's begin: Half if not 2/3 of the movie has a voice over ... at times it does what it is intended to do, provide clarity to what we're seeing but as a lot of teacher would tell you: show us don't tell. It's so overused that it dissociate us from what's happening and yes she is mostly going through her life dissociated but if you're viewer get that feeling well, how are we supposed to connect with the film?
All along the movie the sound or voice is juxtaposed with a different image (taken from another moment) at times and use scarcely it shows the character difficulty to be in the moment .. but when you over used the way it's done here it becomes sloppy , intense and so whiny.
Editing wise the rapid cuts and flash of lights again used to demonstrate the pain the character is in is sooo overused ; we get it! She's in pain!
The directing itself starting at first with the 3/4 ratio well I'm sorry but beside being annoying for a lot of theatre is so pompous especially when it's a debut movie.
The shots lacks purpose and again feels messy and quite crass - the book and obviously the scenario already are , I'm not sure the shots needed to be as well.
Good acting and good music but overall I would say the story wasn't elevated by this movie and left us quite at a distance with it's characters. There's room for improvement so I'm looking forward to the next one.
I usually appreciate biopic and drama and as much as I really appreciate how the character grow and what she is going through the directing and editing were atrocious. Let's begin: Half if not 2/3 of the movie has a voice over ... at times it does what it is intended to do, provide clarity to what we're seeing but as a lot of teacher would tell you: show us don't tell. It's so overused that it dissociate us from what's happening and yes she is mostly going through her life dissociated but if you're viewer get that feeling well, how are we supposed to connect with the film?
All along the movie the sound or voice is juxtaposed with a different image (taken from another moment) at times and use scarcely it shows the character difficulty to be in the moment .. but when you over used the way it's done here it becomes sloppy , intense and so whiny.
Editing wise the rapid cuts and flash of lights again used to demonstrate the pain the character is in is sooo overused ; we get it! She's in pain!
The directing itself starting at first with the 3/4 ratio well I'm sorry but beside being annoying for a lot of theatre is so pompous especially when it's a debut movie.
The shots lacks purpose and again feels messy and quite crass - the book and obviously the scenario already are , I'm not sure the shots needed to be as well.
Good acting and good music but overall I would say the story wasn't elevated by this movie and left us quite at a distance with it's characters. There's room for improvement so I'm looking forward to the next one.
Very rich movie
I saw this movie a few hours ago and loved how it uses nearly every tool in the filmmaker's cookbook. It feels avant-garde at times-voice-over, bold sound choices, wild editing-yet remains immersive, emotional, and engaging. The layered story, taboo-breaking, shock-feminism, and economical dialogue are impressive; much is conveyed with very few words. The character focus is so strong you barely notice the lack of establishing shots. There's a brief section in a Ken Kesey-style writing workshop where there's less tension and things feel slightly more generic, but it still works well. Overall, it's a bold, beautiful film that looks very good too.
Bold First Film
Kristen Stewart's directorial debut is a hard movie to watch, and that's what she intended. The Chronology of Water is unsettling and disturbing and succeeds at getting a reaction out of an audience. It's a movie that is purely based on emotion and lacks a central story or plot. It dives into dark themes without saying very much or having a message about the themes it's exploring. I can appreciate what Stewart was going for but I can't say I was particularly engaged. It definitely felt slow and dragged for me. There's some unique and cool editing and sound design. Overall there is actually a lot to like here, but it didn't entirely work for me. 6/10.
Experimental traumatic art
Beautifully shot and directed and portrayed. The zoom in made wonderful job to feel the depression and pain going through the character even although it has disturbing content. The flashbacks and diluted memories refers to the torturing experiences and scars didn't heal at all leading to annoying decisions and questioning behavior of broken confused spirits.
The Big List of Fall Movies 2025
The Big List of Fall Movies 2025
See a full list of all the movies coming to theaters this fall.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe film is the directorial debut of academy nominated actress Kristen Stewart
- ConexionesReferenced in Radio Dolin: Best Movies of the 2025 Cannes Film Festival (2025)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long will The Chronology of Water be?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- The Chronology of Water
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 89.648 US$
- Duración
- 2h 8min(128 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta







