[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to October 2010 archive page: 1 2 3 ... 8
  • Savvy 12-year-old uses iPod to foil kidnapper

    Apple

    A quick-thinking 12-year-old girl prevented a kidnapper in a van from taking her when she held up her iPod Touch -- which looks exactly like the iPhone -- and told the man she was calling 9-1-1. According to a news report, he then fled.

    The incident happened Wednesday in Stanton, Delaware, and was reported by ABC station WPVI in Philadelphia.

    The girl was standing on a sidewalk outside a middle school, waiting for her ride, when the man drove up and said to her, "Get in the van." When she heard that, she held the iPod Touch to her ear and told the suspect she was calling for help.

    As Cult of Mac points out, the iPod Touch can be turned into a phone using the device's Wi-Fi capability "in a pinch by installing VOIP apps like Truphone to make calls. To use your second- or third-generation iPod Touch as a phone, you’ll need the app plus a headset with microphone, or a microphone adapter like those sold for the iPhone." As long as you're in a Wi-Fi area, you don't even need cellular service from AT&T (currently the exclusive seller of the iPhone in the U.S.).

    Parents, it's something to think about when you're debating whether to get your child the highest-end iPod, which starts at $229. And kids, what better argument to give your folks when lobbying for that iPod Touch than the example cited here?

    ABC - WPVI via Gizmodo and Cult of Mac

  • Will Facebook Places add marketing, free stuff at check-ins?

    Facebook

    Are you a fan, or more importantly a user, of Facebook Places? No badges for you! (Scout-like badges are what location-based check-in service Foursquare offers you for haunting various locales.) But maybe, just maybe, with Facebook Places, you might wind up getting spammed by ads or quite possibly free stuff — things you could use.

    That's according to a report from AllFacebook.com, which says that Facebook is testing a "Facebook Deals" service that "enables businesses to provide deals whenever visitors check-in to a physical store. The new service is being tested with a limited number of partners, and all we currently have access to is a copy of an e-mail sent from Facebook confirming one of the first deals being tested."

    Facebook didn't confirm or deny AllFacebook's report, saying: "We don’t comment on speculation. We have nothing to share at this time.” Late Friday, the social networking site did send out a media invitation for a "mobile event" it plans for 10:30 a.m. Nov. 3. It's not clear from that invitation whether a Places-related announcement will be made.

    The Places deal, says AllFacebook.com, "involves rewarding a Facebook user with a free product when three of a user’s friends are tagged at a specific place. The creators of deals can determine the threshold required to earn a deal.

    "One of the major criticisms of many of the existing check-in services (Foursquare, Gowalla and even Facebook) is the lack of incentives for checking in to various locations."

    It's not clear yet whether Places, just introduced by Facebook in August, is appealing to site's 500 million users, some of whom already feel Facebook already has too much information about them, posted or not. So far, about 30 million people have tried Facebook Places, a source "who works with Facebook" told Silicon Alley Insider.

    As great as it might be to get some free stuff when you go places you're headed already, it could turn annoying or even scary. What happens when Facebook starts spamming you with promos for interests that even your friends of friends don't know about?

  • Adorable pup has 163,000 Facebook fans

    YouTube

    SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Meet Boo, the Pom pup with a lion cut, oodles of YouTube videos and more than 163,000 Facebook fans, doing his darndest to ensure pounds and Pomeranian rescues are bursting at their adorable seams just in time for Christmas.

    I've got three on back order!

    OK. Not really. I have my own precarious collection of abandoned purebreds. Mind you, not enough to make my neighbors call A&E … yet. But certainly enough to understand the unhappy aftermarket that follows adorably problematic pups such as Boo, the Shibu Inu cuties of Puppy Cam fame, post-"Men in Black" pugs, the thousand-and-one deaf and snappy Dalmatians not suited for homes with children, and the current glut of fashionable French Bulldogs parading the streets of New York City.

    Look. I'm not trying to judge. I'm just built that way.

    The Internet is made of Cute, and I'm not immune to Boo or the rest of the Web's baby animal charms. Single-service sites such as Disapproving Rabbits, Turtles Eating Things and Hungover Owls are some of my favorite urls. I no doubt contributed to Frenchie-mania with my interview of Martha Stewart's dogs. I posted a link to that pug that pushes a stroller just this morning! And I proudly boast a close Twitter friendship with the photo-crashing Banff Squirrel.

    The great thing about the Banff Squirrel is, you can't own the Banff Squirrel. The Amish don't operate baby squirrel mills (as far as I know). You're not going to try and catch a squirrel in your backyard because you'll get rabies. You'll never see pics of Paris Hilton on the town, teacup squirrel in hand ... hopefully. The Banff Squirrel's squee factor has no downside.

    Meanwhile, Petfinder.com offers infinite choices of your favorite meme dog trendy original owners couldn't be bothered to house train.

    Mommies and daddies rarely post YouTube videos of their darling fur baby eating the Wiimote, horking up a lung, running up $3,000 in vet bills for that ingrown claw that went to his brain, or peeing on every surface in the house. Thirty seraphic seconds of a little angel's awwwwwwww-inducing head bobbing does not come close to telling a whole story.

    Indeed, Boo is cute, and insanely so. Obviously he's both loved and cared for by his humans. He looks like a healthy Mr. Winkle. Unlike a fantasy pup, Boo appears held together by more than fluff and your belief that he exists.

    He's a dog. And before you bring home your pet store purchase on a whim, remember that dogs also do this:

  • Apple now in top 5 global cell phone vendors

    Apple

    Sales of the iPhone 4 helped propel Apple into the top-five worldwide cell phone ranking.

    Apple is now among the top five worldwide vendors of all cell phones -- not just smart phones -- vaulting to fourth place in the third quarter this year, when the iPhone 4 went on sale, according to new reports from two research firms.

    "Apple was the star performer, as it jumped into the top-five rankings for the first time," said Neil Mawston, Strategy Analytics' director, global wireless practice.

    Research firm IDC, in its third-quarter "Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker" report said that "the growing popularity of converged mobile devices, or smart phones, with consumers and businesspersons is evidenced by the appearance of a second smart phone-only vendor in the top 5 ranking ... joining Research In Motion (RIM) as one of the world's largest mobile phone suppliers."

    Apple "leapt ahead of several vendors in 3Q10 including RIM, which it surpassed by 1.7 million units, and Sony Ericsson by 3.7 million units," IDC said.

    "The company's record shipment performance can be attributed to the introduction of the iPhone 4 in 17 new countries last quarter. The record performance came despite 'Antennagate,' the name used to describe the controversy around alleged iPhone reception problems, in July."

    On IDC's top five list of cell phone vendors worldwide:

    1. Nokia - The phone giant retains its top spot, but third-quarter shipments increased only by 1.8 percent over the third quarter in 2009.

    2. Samsung - Up 18.6 percent over a year ago, "pushing through the 70 million unit mark for the first time in the company's history." In addition to a standard phone business, Samsung has been making smart phones that use the Android operating system and now Windows Phone 7, both challenging the iPhone.

    3. LG Electronics - While it's third, the company actually shipped 10.1 percent fewer phones in the third quarter of this year than last. "LG has yet to make a significant impact in the smart phone category, unlike its competitors," IDC said.

    4. Apple - The company shipped 14.1 million phones in the third quarter of the year, a 90.5 percent increase over last year's third quarter.

    5. Research In Motion - RIM "posted a record number of unit shipments" -- 12.4 million phones -- in the third quarter. "The BlackBerry maker continues to grow in Latin America, for example, due to the success of the Curve 8520 entry-level model, which has helped drive growth in most emerging markets. The vendor's results were also boosted by the introduction of the higher-cost Torch in the United States, a key market due to the size and intensity of competition."

    Sony Ericsson, which shipped 10.4 million units in the third quarter, "fell off the top-five list for the first time" since IDC's Tracker was started in 2004.

    Strategy Analytics list confirmed the same rankings. Apple's growth "continues to come from expanding its retail presence across dozens of countries and operators worldwide," said the firm. And that growth is expected to continue.

    "A next major wave of expansion is likely to come from a CDMA version of the iPhone at Verizon Wireless in the U.S., a move that could put considerable competitive pressure on Samsung, LG and Motorola in the first half of 2011."

  • Google Nexus Two phone in the works

    Gizmodo

    Nexus Two

    Looks like Google is not giving up when it comes to making its own phone: word of a Nexus Two phone, successor to the Nexus One, has been spreading in recent days, and Gizmodo Friday shared a mock-up of the device, said to be built by Samsung.

    "It's not going rock your face like the Nexus One did. But it will record it with a front-facing camera" for video chat, said Gizmodo, which reports "a friend of ours" got to handle one.

    "Our source thinks is the same 4-inch AMOLED affair from the (Samsung) Galaxy series, is flat, the front is 'sort of concave' with hard edges. And the back is curved. The tapering makes it feel thinner than Galaxy S, though it might be about the same thickness."

    The Nexus One phone, released early this year, was a critical success but a financial flop. Google took a revolutionary approach by selling the $529 phone only via the Web and without a carrier contract. Two carriers -- T-Mobile and AT&T -- could run the phone on their GSM networks. Sprint, which like Verizon Wireless, uses a CDMA network, was going to support the phone, but then backed off. (With a two-year T-Mobile contract, the phone cost $179.)

    Over the summer, Google shuttered its Web store, with the company's Android guru, Andy Rubin, saying that it was a "niche channel for early adopters, but it’s clear that many customers like a hands-on experience before buying a phone, and they also want a wide range of service plans to chose from."

    The Nexus One (made by HTC) was often described by Google as a "super phone," a kind of king of Android-based phones, using Google's open-source operating system.

    When it went on sale last January, there were only a few Android phones -- including the Motorola Droid and the T-Mobile G1 -- making a dent in the marketplace. Since then, there has been an explosion of Android devices, many from Motorola, but also from HTC, Samsung and LG.

    Will a Nexus Two meet a better fate? Perhaps, but keeping the same name of a failed phone is not a good way to start off anew.

  • Pre-caffeine tech: Mt Everest 3G, end of butt dials, Pug-o-ween!

    @JennyThePug/Urlesque

    Good news everybody! Backwards time travel is yours to be downloaded in the form of all 900 gigabytes of Geocities!

    Mount Everest has 3G wireless coverage! Even before it gets a Starbucks!

    Google's Nexus Two totally exists! And there are five ways this cell phone of the not too distant future could bust carrier control!

    There's a free app to prevent butt-dials on your Android!

    The FCC cleared up Verizon's mystery cell phone fees with a $25 million fine!

    Talk about shocking! Future touchscreens may use electrostatic feedback!

    Facebook made a virtual page version of those "Best Friend" split charms that were big in the 80s!

    The school board member who posted an anti-gay screed on Facebook unfriended his elected postion.

    You can now sign into Flickr from your Google account!

    Jenny the infamous stroller-pushing pug of Portland, Oregon wishes you a Happy Halloween!

  • Facebook is no friend to gay-bashing school official

    Hey everybody! I'm a jerk!

    Gay-bashing Arkansas Midland School District board member Clint McCance is not getting the credit he deserves. Last week, when McCance chose to spread his expletive-laced hate speech towards dead gay children via Facebook, his timing was perfect.

    Preventing LGBT suicides is one hot topic, what with the momentum behind the "It Gets Better" video archive project. Anyone out there still questioning the severity of an issue that has private citizens, celebrities and President Obama making videos telling isolated kids that there is nothing wrong with them? McCance, whose position revolves around the future of children, helpfully blights all doubt.

    Inspired by a Facebook invitation to wear purple on "Spirit Day" to honor students who suffered homophobic bullying and committed suicide, McCance threw both caution and grammar to the wind, posting this -- to a page that hadn't been secured using Facebook's privacy settings:

    "Seriously they want me to wear purple because five queers killed themselves. The only way im wearin it for them is if they all commit suicide. I cant believe the people of this world have gotten this stupid. We are honoring the fact that they sinned and killed thereselves because of their sin. REALLY PEOPLE."

    Six Facebook friends gave the thumbs-up "Like" to McCance's hate update. When another challenged McCance, he expounded:

    "Being a f-g doesn't give you the right to ruin the rest of our lives. If you get easily offended by being called a f-g then dont tell anyone you are a f-g. Keep that s--- to yourself. I dont care how people decide to live their lives. They dont bother me if they keep it to thereselves. It pisses me off though that we make a special purple f-g day for them. I like that f-gs cant procreate. I also enjoy the fact that they often give each other aids and die. If you arent against it, you might as well be for it."

    "I would disown my kids they were gay. They will not be welcome at my home or in my vicinity. I will absolutely run them off. Of course my kids will know better. My kids will have solid christian beliefs. See it infects everyone."

    The Advocate happened upon the school board member's screed, and soon enough, thousands of Facebook users were sharing their true feelings about McCance via the group Fire Clint McCance. While distancing the school system and the school board from McCance's post, the Midland school superintendent released a statement implying it would not take action against the elected official's actions as a private citizen. The Arkansas Department of Education seemed a bit more concerned. On Thursday, McCance announced that he would resign.

    Indeed, McCance does deserve the boot -- not for exercising his right to free speech, mind you, but for being full-on stupid.

    How is it McCance got elected to the school board without the ability to work out this simple logic equation: "I sit on the school board. The school board's job concerns young people. Young people are committing suicide. If I post, on my publicly viewable Facebook account, my hatred for young people who are committing suicide, my position on the school board might be affected."

    What a seriously weird disconnect.

    Perhaps McCance never took Internet 101: A Nigerian prince's widow does not want to give you money. CitiBank doesn't request your Social Security number via e-mail. Young hot singles in your area are not looking to meet you. If you publicly post ignorant, inflammatory words or pictures on Facebook, you may draw fire from the people who are affected by your public role.

    We can go blah blah blahall the live-long day over whether McCance -- or anyone who's ever been Facebook fired -- should be called into question for what he does or says or spews as a "private citizen." But that's not how the brave new world of social media works. My sister will take a turn even when the oncoming car isn't slowing down because hey, she has the right of way. We can argue McCance's rights to be a hateful bigot when he's off the clock, and my sister can get "right of way" engraved on her tombstone. Y'all feel me?

    Let's just call this willful ignorance of how the world works "Facebook blindness." Like Facebook itself, "Facebook blindness" is neither good or evil -- just a thing that can be used. In this case, Facebook and McCance's apparent blindness did an excellent job of shining the light on an issue he's adamantly against -- preventing teen suicides.

    While recent suicides of young people suffering homophobic harassment puts this epidemic in the media spotlight, it is by no means anything new. While McCance is getting all the heat for his hate speech, he is by no means alone in either belief or actions. If someone was saying that to a child, wouldn't you want to know? Now you do.

    See how useful Facebook can be?

    For online support for LGBT kids and teens visit:

    It Gets Better Project on YouTube.

    The Trevor Project, a national 24-hour, toll-free confidential suicide hotline for gay and questioning youth.

    GLSEN: Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, an organization for students, parents, and teachers that tries to affect positive change in schools.

    Related:

    YouTube channel offers hope to gay teens

    Follow Helen A.S. Popkin on Twitter or Friend her on Facebook. What are ya, chicken?

  • Google refines local search with Place Search tool

    Google

    Google further honed its local search Thursday, introducing Place Search, a new program that organizes information around specific locations so users "can more easily make comparisons and decide where to go," and should snip about two seconds off such searches.

    "Say you’re looking for that great barbecue restaurant with live music," writes Jackie Bavaro, Google product manager, on the company's blog. With Place Search, checking barbecue joints in the city of Austin, you get the result shown above, marked with red pins.

    "Each one is a unique restaurant with relevant information and links from across the web," Bavaro wrote. "I can see that Stubb’s has live music, and I can click citysearch.com, tripadvisor.com and other sites to read reviews. In the past, the same search would return links with information about Stubb’s in different parts of the results page ... Now information is grouped conveniently to make it easier to digest and compare."

    SearchEngineWatch.com noted that Place Search is "dramatically redrawing the search marketing landscape. It's more critical than ever for businesses to implement a local search, online review, and search engine optimization (SEO) strategy to achieve prominent visibility in the results Google displays for location specific searches."

    Place Search results "will begin appearing automatically on Google when we predict you’re looking for local information," Bavaro said. Users will also see a new link for "Places" in the left-hand panel of the search results page "so you can switch to these results whenever you want."

    Place Search dynamically connects "hundreds of millions of websites with more than 50 million real-world locations," she said.

    "One of the great things about our approach is that it makes it easier to find a comprehensive view of each place. In our new layout you’ll find many more relevant links on a single results page — often 30 or 40. Instead of doing eight or 10 searches, often you’ll get to the sites you’re looking for with just one search. In our testing Place Search saves people an average of two seconds on searches for local information."

    Place Search is being rolled out now, and should be available worldwide "in more than 40 languages in the next few days," Bavaro wrote. Google's goal -- besides making advertisers happy -- is "to help you feel like a local everywhere you go."

  • Facebook spent $6,600 to help kill Social Network Privacy Act

    Facebook gives a lot of lip service about its deep concerns for your online privacy, but the world's largest social networking site doesn't say much about its own lobbying forays.

    There wasn't a lot of fanfare when Facebook opened up its office in Washington D.C. And there's no company-issued press release or post of Facebook's blog about the $6,600 the Palo Alto-based company spent lobbying in California against the state's proposed Social Network Privacy Act. Facebook's recent state filing, noted by MarketWatch, revealed the expenses were specifically directed at the bill that would restrict social networking sites from displaying the address and phone numbers of minors.

    "The reported lobbying activity underlines Facebook’s need to make its case with both state and federal legislators, amid growing concerns about online privacy," writes MarketWatch's John Letzing. "It also highlights the early stage of the social networking firm’s progress."

    The bill, introduced in February by Sen. Ellen Corbett, D-Calif., passed in the state Senate in April, but stalled in the state Assembly. "By the time it got to the Assembly, the opposition lobbying had begun," Corbett told MarketWatch. Facebook did not comment on the MarketWatch story.

    With two registered lobbyists and four public policy staffers, Facebook's presence in Washington D.C. is still comparatively small. "All told, Facebook spends less money in the Capitol in a year than some other tech giants do in three months," noted Politico, pointing to the $221,000 the social network spent from January through September.

    Meanwhile, Google spent more than $3.8 million dealing with government officials over that same time period. Amazon, eBay and Yahoo all spent more than $1 million.

    As government officials continue to focus on the very hot -- albeit not quite understood -- issue of online privacy, Facebook's D.C. budget will no doubt continue to grow. A lot of registered voters hang out on Facebook -- and there's always another online privacy kerfuffle around the corner.

  • Spoiler alert! 100 scary movies in five minutes

    Just in time for Halloween, the Fine Brothers remind us how much of the horror movie genre is crapped up with crappy sequels, as well as a recent Hollywood conceit -- the reboot. More importantly, the YouTube comedy duo help clear your Netflix queue with their rapid-fire rundown of 100 scary movies in less than five minutes in a single take.

    As with their 50 Book Spoilers in 4 minutes, 50 Movie Spoilers of 2009, 100 TV Spoilers and 50 Nintendo Spoilers, all the high points are covered, sans pesky time sucks such as exposition and character development -- not that there's much of that in these sorts of films to begin with.

    Draculas die, a possessed priest throws himself down stairs, Rosemary gives birth to the anti-Christ, Jigsaw keeps killing people even after his death, Ali Larter and Taye Diggs survive with the help of Chris Kattan's ghost and Freddy, Michael Myers, Jason and Chuckie keep coming back in sequels even worse than the originals. Plus! In the spirit of "Bruce Willis was dead the entire time!" the Fine Brothers reveal their own twist ending, which you just have to see for yourself.

  • Pre-caffeine tech: Bill Gates friends Facebook?

    theclockblog.blogspot.com/

    James Cameron got all "Avatar" on Google CEO, telling technologists to be better stewards of the planet.

    Gawker made a map of Google's legal troubles -- using Google Maps (OH SNAP!), while Wilson Rothman mapped out half-baked Google TV (DOUBLE SNAP!).

    MySpace got called out for stealing its hot new look for fall.

    Jezebel called out the 15 best "It Gets Better" videos for Dan Savage's suicide prevention project for LGBT teens.

    Apple's online store is all, "This is not the white iPhone 4 you're looking for."

    This is the iPad for Verizon Wireless you're looking for.

    What, exactly, was Bill Gates looking for on his not-so-secret visit to Facebook?

    Now we know Facebook was looking to stomp the Senate's Networking Privacy Act.

    BoingBoing totally got NSFW hacked for Halloween.

    Zombies are so 2009! "Angry Birds" are the cutting edge costumes for this year's gaming adults!

  • Horrifying iPhone games to haunt your Halloween

    Spicy Horse Games

    Like the feeling of shivers running down your spine? Let the "Akaneiro" app get you in the Halloween mood.

    With All Hallow's Eve approaching, Apple's App Store is offering a plethora of Halloween-themed game apps. But be forewarned: The only terrifying thing about many of these iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad games is just how awful they are.

    And yet, while many of these apps seem designed to do nothing but part you from your candy money, there are some wonderfully spooky, creepy and downright disturbing games that are well worth playing ... and paying for. There are also some hilarious can't-miss Halloween-themed choices as well. 

    Here are a few of the best:


    Activision

    Call of Duty: World at War: Zombies - $4.99, iPhone/iPad
    This game combines two of the most terrifying creatures ever to stalk our nightmares — zombies and Nazis. I mean really, can you imagine anything more horrific? In this game, based on the zombie maps in "Call of Duty: World at War," the zombie Nazis are coming at you from all sides. It's your job to gun them down before they eat your brains (of course). The controls work well, the eerie sound design is top-notch and the whole affair is really quite spooky. Better yet, you can fend off these zombies with friends — the game supports up to four-player co-op.

    Spicy Horse Games

    Akaneiro$3.99, iPad
    Technically this is an interactive iPad book rather than a game, but there are some gaming elements mixed into this beautiful and spooky touch-screen tale. "Akeneiro" acts as something of a sequel to the Little Red Riding Hood fairy tale. Here we find a mysterious young girl on a dark journey in which she must face a long-forgotten enemy. The art is gorgeous and the tale is chilling. And the good news is, it looks like there are plans to continue this story line in future installments.

    Telltale Games

    Puzzle Agent$4.99/6.99, iPhone/iPad
    This puzzle-filled game is little bit like the "Professor Layton" Nintendo DS games crossed with "Twin Peaks." ("Twin Peaks" was TV show in the early '90s for you youngsters.) No, it's not scream-out-loud-scary, but it is creepy much in the way that "Twin Peaks" was. That is, FBI agent Nelson Tethers finds himself investigating a mysterious explosion at an eraser-making plant in a remote town filled with bizarre characters. Solve the puzzles as you try to find out what kind of nefarious force is behind this deadly acccident. Not only is the game a little creepy, it's also dang funny.

    Chillingo

    Vampire Origins Reloaded99 cents, iPhone/iPad
    You won't find any sparkly vampires here. Instead, you'll find a resurrected vampire hunter out to annihilate as many creatures of the night as he can. This gothic 3-D action/adventure features some cool comic-book-style cut-scenes, lots of vampire killing and some smart puzzling to boot. Try out the "lite" version for free.

    Rovio Mobile

    Angry Birds Halloween – 99 cents/$1.99, iPhone/iPad
    You really can't go wrong with this Halloween-themed special edition follow-up to the mega-hit game "Angry Birds." Against various spooktacular backdrops you'll fling those furious birds at the pigs who wronged them across 45 new levels. And what is this Golden Egg of Terror? You'll have to play to find out.

    Ratloop

    Helsing's Fire 99 cents/iPhone
    This wonderfully original puzzle game finds Professor Helsing and his assistant Raffton taking on Dracula and his many monstrous minions. The basics are this: Monsters are scattered about each level. You must figure out where to place torches and tonics to illuminate and destroy these monsters. The dialog is witty, the puzzles are thought-provoking and the whole thing is done in with smart, stylish flair.

    Halfbrick Studios

    Monster Dash 99 cents/iPhone
    In this funny, fast-paced platforming game you'll control monster hunter Barry Steakfries as he runs at non-stop, break-neck speed trying to gun down as many monsters as he can (mummies, werewolves, vampires, you name it), while leaping across one deadly chasm after another. This game is easy to jump into but very hard to walk away from.

    PopCap Games

    Plants vs. Zombies99 cents/$4.99, iPhone/iPad
    Well, duh. Of COURSE this is a perfect game to get you in the Halloween spirit. It's also perhaps the best tower-defense game ever made. It's also HI-freakin-larious. More importantly, you will not be able to stop playing it once you start. Zombies want to get into your house. It's your job to plant the, uh, plants that will stop them. This game is available on the PC, Xbox 360, iPhone and the iPad. If you have an iPad, I encourage you to not miss out on giving it a play there.

    Boo!

    Winda Benedetti writes the Citizen Gamer column for msnbc.com. You can follow her tweets about games and other things right here on Twitter.

  • Google TV review: Only half baked

    Logitech, Sony

    While the idea behind Google TV holds great promise, the first products to come from that vision are too impotent and hard to use. The search giant, flush from back-to-back revolutions in the Internet and mobile spaces, decided to aim a missile of change at the very broken television experience. It's noble, but it could well be just another Google idea doomed to fizzle.

    After testing both the $300 Logitech Revue and the $400 Sony Internet TV Blu-ray player — which are about 90 percent identical Google TV systems — I can tell you that the platform is nowhere near ready for your viewing enjoyment.

    Apps
    As you can probably guess from Google's interest in the subject, Google TV is about apps and search. The Logitech and Sony devices — set-top boxes which you connect to the Internet and to your cable or satellite box — are supposed to be partly a "relax, we got it covered" manager of content, and a "hey, check this out" guide to discovering more. They run Android and will get a version of the Android Market, with apps made especially for Google TV, sometime early next year. Currently, though, the included apps are fixed and limited: Netflix, Picasa, Pandora ... and not a whole lot else. Most other "apps" are just links to websites, such as Amazon Video on Demand. You click an "app" and instead, the browser launches. At that point, you are required to do what you'd do if you were on a computer: Log in, browse your options via touchpad, select and play.

    If the website is compatible, that is. Google is currently promoting, on the "Spotlight" page, the HBO Go service. However, Comcast subscribers are blocked from the Go service, because Comcast serves up HBO content on its own online VOD service, Fancast. But when you go to Fancast, you're told that the site is not compatible with Google TV, because it only works on computers running Microsoft's Internet Explorer and Apple's Safari. So here I am, a paying HBO subscriber, teased into thinking I can see HBO on this box, then let down by technological shortcomings and Hollywood licensing roadblocks. That right there is a common theme with Google TV.

    (You might recall that CBS, ABC and NBC recently blocked Google TV's browser from accessing their programming; Hulu.com is also blocked. Google says that it is working with Hulu on an app — like the ones currently available for iPad, iPhone, Samsung Blu-ray players and Sony's PlayStation 3, and soon on the Xbox 360, TiVo Premiere and Roku's competing set-top box — but there's no promise of a specific arrival date.) 

    Logitech

    A screen showing the search interface, here depicted overlaying a show playing on TV.

    Search
    The promise of search is that it will unify the increasing sources of video. You type in a search for, say, Clint Eastwood, and you get a vast menu of clips and text to choose from, including — one imagines — any TV and movies associated with said Hollywood legend. Only you don't get that, not now. When I search for Clint Eastwood, I see a screen that includes the following:

    • A notice of when his film "A Perfect World" will be playing, but since it's going to happen in the future, I am told I will have to record it manually via my DVR (with no help from Google TV).

    • A link to Google TV's listing for "Rawhide," but since there are no episodes listed, it's a dead end.

    • A link to Wikipedia's Clint Eastwood entry — but, strangely, not IMDB's.

    There is also an option to do a more thorough Web search.

    Even though there are apps for Netflix and Amazon Video on Demand pre-installed on every Google TV, the search doesn't have the power to peek into their catalogs, or even the shows I've personally queued up in the services. From what I have gathered from Google, going forward, it's not clear that the search will be compatible with any apps, even though that's where 99 percent of the good content will come from — not just Netflix but Sony's Qriocity already found on Sony's GTV box; Hulu Plus, which is due sometime in the near future; and any number of other potential app builders with quality video-on-demand services.

    The clincher is this: I can have the same movie queued on Netflix, recorded on my TiVo and stored on my home network server, and none of the three will appear in a search, even though I can use Google TV to navigate to them and play them on my TV.

    Sony

    Google TV's screen interface, here showing the Netflix and NBA apps along with Sony's Qriocity movies-on-demand app.

    Interface
    The insult on top of the functional injury for Google TV is the interface. The keyboard should have tipped me off that this wasn't some relaxing couch experience, but actual work, required of me. During set up, you type a lot, but when you are just leaning back and relaxing, you still have these honking big remotes. Sony's is compact enough, but it's still larger than a game controller, and like a game controller, it sometimes requires your right hand and left hand to control separate parts of the interface. The Logitech remote is a lot more straightforward, but takes up four times the space on the coffee table.

    There's a lot of confusion in the interface: There are apps, Web links and the system software — by both Google and the hardware makers Logitech and Sony — all responding to the same set of buttons and clicks. It's easy to be one place and then click a back button, suddenly finding yourself on a screen you'd left an hour before. Meanwhile, everything is layered on top of your normal set-top box experience, in my case a TiVo HD. Because much of the interface appears in layers, there are moments where you see very conflicting things at the same time — at one point I had search results on top, with a screen asking me to pair my device with my Android phone underneath. It was startling, but showed that there's nobody conducting traffic here. Not at this point.

    Logitech, Sony

    The remotes that come with the Logitech Revue and Sony Internet TV, both with QWERTY keyboards and touchpads for mouse-like control.

    Splintering
    Speaking of phone pairing, the Logitech Revue has a free Harmony app for controlling everything via your phone, and Sony's Internet TV controller for Android will appear soon. But that's part of the problem: If Google TV is this one thing, why does every device get its own Android app? I have to say, I like having hardware options: Logitech's solo set-top box with video-conferencing capability, Sony's Blu-ray player and full-fledged connected TV. It's nice to have a choice. But Google has enough problems as it is creating a platform that makes any kind of sense — allowing Logitech and Sony (and whoever else jumps on board) to go their own routes towards customization will only screw things up. Google let partners in before the fundamental operating system was locked down, and the result is confusion.

    To say Google TV is the opposite of Apple TV is maybe putting it too simply, especially since both are busy trying to expand their content offerings to partners. Still, the former is an anything-for-anybody set-up which ends up spread way too thin, while the latter is, at the moment, a too-tightly-controlled experience. But if Apple TV gets apps, or even just builds on its current partnerships with Netflix and Flickr by adding Hulu Plus and Pandora, not to mention Facebook and Twitter, it will be a solid platform that supports other solid platforms. Google TV may quickly get more partners, but unless they fix the overall experience, those partners ultimately will feel cheated.

    I recognize that I haven't said many (or any) nice things about Google TV. Both the Logitech Revue and Sony GTV Blu-ray player are very nice pieces of hardware, highly responsive and capable of very impressive feats. But nothing they do is unique at this point, and they're therefore not worth considering. Roku and Apple have far cheaper, smaller and simpler devices that manage much of the same tasks without interface headaches, and a new product, D-Link's Boxee box, is on the way with more potential (albeit unproven). Blu-ray players by Samsung, LG, Panasonic and, yes, Sony, offer far better values as well, if you want to include a disc player.

    The only reason I don't just write-off Google's own admission that this is a work in progress is Android. More specifically, the somewhat problematic launch of the buggy and aesthetically questionable Android 1.0, on the underpowered and underwhelming T-Mobile G1. "Wait and see" was a common trope among reviewers and technorati, and when we did wait, what we saw was a powerhouse platform. That's partly because Apple essentially cleared the way for Android's success, at least in the U.S., by not spreading over to Verizon sooner. But it's also because Android matured into a manageable operating system with a pleasant interface and useful third-party options.

    So, will the ugly duckling that is Google TV mature into a graceful swan? Or will it have to be put down when Google realizes its wings won't flap? That remains to be seen. But for now, it's not for you. Let's all just wait and see.

    Catch up with Wilson on Twitter at @wjrothman. Who else do you know who'd care to hear your opinions on today's set-top boxes?

    Related stories:

    • Apple TV vs. Google TV: What's the difference?

    • Google tamed text, but video is fighting back

    • Google TV: What it's supposed to do

  • Envy will make you buy an iPhone

    Pocket Lint

    Yeah, you can't have it.

    Envy will make you buy an iPhone. No shocker there -- it's the core of Apple's master plan. It doesn't matter how cool it is now, something cooler is less than a year away.

    So of course researchers at Tilburg University in the Netherlands chose this modern marvel of ever-upgrading function and design to test the effects of envy and how it can attract and repel consumer purchases.

    Turns out, you're more likely to purchase an iPhone -- or other allegedly awesome thing -- if you think the person who owns said awesome thing deserves it. Convince yourself that person is a jerk, and you're likely to buy something different -- say, a BlackBerry -- just to set yourself apart.

    It all comes down to benign and malicious envy. To differentiate between the two, researchers broke their student test subjects into three groups and exposed each group to fictitious iPhone-owner back stories:

    • An iPhone owner who worked hard for his purchase (benign envy).
    • An iPhone owner whose father purchased it for him (malicious envy).
    • An iPhone owner with no back story (control group).

    Students who viewed the hard-working iPhone owner were willing to pay 117 more euros than students who saw the iPhone owner with no back story, and 75 more euros than the students who watched the iPhone trustafarian. Meanwhile, students who watched the video of iPhone owner courtesy of Bank of Daddy, were willing to pay 98 euros more for a BlackBerry.

    "This study says little about the personal effects of envy, but much about the economic effects," observes Casey Johnston in the Ars Technica piece on the study. "That is, if a company can get its customers to rigorously compare themselves against an opponent's customers and view themselves as slightly superior (thanks in part to their enlightened products), those customers can turn into nearly blind followers."

    Of course, as Johnston points out, "a psych study is not an actual economic forum and it's hard to say whether the students would have followed through with their assertions about the products' values."

    All I know is, my signal-dropping iPhone 3G, that still more than meets my needs, was little more than a brick to me Saturday night when my much cooler friend Ben pulled out his black iPhone 4.

    Just imagine how he'll feel this spring when I pull out my Verizon iPhone 5 … in white!

  • 'WoW' superfan just blew your mind

    "World of Warcraft" is a massive game with an enormous lore and epic backstory. One can only wonder how the game designers and writers keep it all straight.

    Well, apparently, they sometimes don't. But even if they can't, there is one man who can. Apparently it's this guy:

    At the BlizzCon 2010 conference this past weekend, one man – his head full of game minutia – took to the microphone to ask Blizzard's Chris Metzen, Vice President of Creative Development, and Alex Afrasiabi, Lead World Designer, about an inconsistency he'd spotted.


    Check out their reaction … and their promise to fix the mistake(!)

    Yes, as the video has made its way around the web, many have found cause to mock this "WoW" red shirt. He has been called nerd. He has been called dork. He's been encouraged to "get a life" a la Shatner's famed Saturday Night Live skit.

    But I say kudos to this man for braving the crowds and calling Blizzard on their flub. Go WoW superfan, go!

    Winda Benedetti writes the Citizen Gamer column for msnbc.com. You can follow her tweets about games and other things right here on Twitter.

  • Viagra spam terminated -- somewhat

    Want to rid your formerly communist country's nasty reputation as one of world's largest exporters of Internet spam? Call in the Governator!

    Two weeks before a Silicon Valley trade delegation, led by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger of California, visited Russia's President Dmitri A. Medvedev, Russia-based SpamIt.com -- believed to be the largest spam sponsor on the Internet -- mysteriously closed up shop. SpamIt.com kingpin Igor A. Gusev is under criminal investigation and probably fled the country.

    Since then, reports the New York Times, e-mail spam for Viagra and prescription drugs dropped by 20 percent. Realistically, it's less about Schwarzenegger and more about President Medvedev's goal of making Russia's Internet industry respectable, and moving it "away from its reputation as a playground for hackers, pornographers and authors of darkly ingenious viruses."

    One-fifth of Internet spam is still a drop in the bucket however, considering that 200 million spam e-mails circulate the Internet daily, accounting for 90 percent of all e-mail. Russia, one of the largest spam exporters in the world, is notorious for its lackadaisical attitude toward those who co-opt zombie computers to spread spam worldwide. The SpamIt.com investigation and President Medvedev's summer visit to Silicon Alley, may mean significantly less spam in junk folders of the near future.

    For now, it leaves Internet security experts scratching their heads. As the New York Times reports:

    "Computer security researchers have conjectured that spamming gangs have sometimes been co-opted by the intelligence agencies in Russia, which provide cover for the spamming activities in exchange for the criminals' expertise or for allowing their networks of virus-infected computers to be used for political purposes -- to crash dissident Web sites, for example, or to foster attacks on foreign adversaries."

    The Russian government denies everything. SpamIt.com guy Gusev, meanwhile, ran sites connected to the same server farm identified in the 2008 Georgia Internet attacks.

  • T-Mobile gets first BlackBerry Bold with OS 6

    T-Mobile

    BlackBerry Bold 9780

    T-Mobile joins AT&T and Sprint in announcing a BlackBerry running Research In Motion's new and improved operating system, OS 6. But instead of being a new design, this updated phone is none other than the best-selling BlackBerry Bold. T-Mobile said Wednesday it will sell the BlackBerry Bold 9780 with OS 6 starting Nov. 17. The phone will cost $129.99 after a two year-contract.

    Why is OS 6 a big deal? Anyone who's used a BlackBerry knows, yes, it's reliable and generally has great security, but it can be kludgy and slow compared to some of the sleeker, more fluid operating systems on competing phones. OS 6 has a new Web browser based on WebKit, the same engine used by Apple and Google. It's much faster than its painfully slow and frustrating predecessor.

    The hallmark of the new OS is universal search, something that also is already offered on the iPhone, Android and Palm devices. It lets users search their devices by keyword to find anything on the device — in e-mail, contacts or music, for example — to that keyword. All in all, the new OS is a friendlier experience.

    In August, BlackBerry maker Research In Motion and AT&T had a gala unveiling of the BlackBerry Torch. The first RIM phone to use the new operating system, the Torch resembles a Palm Pre with its slide-out keyboard. Subsequently, Sprint and RIM announced the BlackBerry Style, the first flip phone running a BlackBerry OS. T-Mobile is the first to show off a more standard-issue BlackBerry, though Verizon is apparently close on T-Mo's heels with an OS 6-equipped BlackBerry Bold of its own.

    T-Mobile's Bold 9780 is not a touchscreen model, like the Torch. The new Bold has a 5-megapixel autofocus camera with LED flash and video recording. It uses a 624 MHz processor, has 512 MB of internal memory and support for up to 32 GB with a 2GB memory card included, says T-Mobile.

    Oh, and for those who don't want too traditional a BlackBerry, there will be a white model available, hopefully making it to stores sooner than Apple's ill-fated little white knight.

  • Sony PlayStation phone to join crowded field?

    Engadget

    A Sony PlayStation phone -- long talked about, but late to the mobile party -- may be coming after all.

    Engadget shared photos of a prototype PlayStation phone it said may be out this year, although 2011 is "looking much more realistic."

    Sony Ericsson, contacted by msnbc.com, says it "does not comment on rumours, speculation or unannounced products," which leaves the issue fairly muddled.

    With the iPhone (and iPod Touch) a heavy player in the mobile games market, and Android growing quickly as well, the notion of a PlayStation phone seems almost ... quaint, something that might have made sense several years ago, but is outdated now.

    Not necessarily so, says Avi Greengart, research director for consumer devices at Current Analysis.

    While the PlayStation phone is "only a rumor at this point ... mobile gaming on phones is a large and growing trend."

    Sony Ericsson's phones are not as high-profile or alluring as iPhones, Android devices or BlackBerrys. And Microsoft, with its new Windows Phone 7 integrating Xbox Live, looks to finally have real life. (Msnbc.com is a joint venture of Microsoft and NBC Universal.)

    But it's all those threats that make a PlayStation phone's chances good, says Ross Rubin, director of industry analysis for The NPD Group research firm.

    "Games have been among the most popular apps for smart phones, and Apple has been able to leverage developer interest in the iPhone to make the iPod Touch a more direct competitor to handheld consoles," he said.

    Sony Ericsson could use a win here. The company's overall cell phone shipment ranking fell to sixth place in the second quarter, down from fourth in the first quarter, according to a recent report from iSuppli research.

    That "marked the first time in at least three years that Sony Ericsson didn’t rank among the Top 5 global cell phone brands."

    But, notes iSuppli, Sony Ericsson also "achieved a 15.4 percent increase in smart phone shipments during the second quarter. This made Sony Ericsson the fourth fastest growing smart phone brand during the second quarter."

    With its "shift" from "volume to value-add" -- and a PlayStation phone would be that -- the company is "positioning itself to cash in on the fastest growing and most profitable segment of the global wireless market,” said Tina Teng, senior analyst for wireless communications at iSuppli.

    The PlayStation phone, according to Engadget, would use Google's increasingly popular Android operating system, and Sony Ericsson CEO Bert Nordberg recently said that the company's goal is to "become the global No. 1 handset provider on the Android platform."

    Engadget says the PlayStation phone will use Android and Sony's "Marketplace, which will allow you to purchase and download games designed for the new platform ... The device ... is sporting a 1GHz Qualcomm MSM8655 ... 512MB of RAM, 1GB of ROM, and the screen is in the range of 3.7 to 4.1 inches."

    Gaming website NowGamer, based in Britain, thinks the phone is fake. A "closer look at the top screen in particular reveals a number of telltale signs, such as a large amount of dirt collecting around the screen, as well as mention of 'A' and 'B' buttons on the interface."

    Whether the prototype is real or not, a PlayStation phone stands a good chance, says Rubin, who makes a good point.

    "A handset that has close ties to a home console has an opportunity to be a more casual companion since gamers need to carry phones anyway."

  • YouTube: Everything you'd probably rather not know

    YouTube

    Anyone who gets paid to sit in front of a computer no doubt makes at least one casual visit to YouTube -- for a daily dose of animal cuteness, the latest viral sensation along the lines of "David After Dentist," or just to check out what Hitler's mad about now.

    There are those however, who spend a lot more time on the video-sharing site -- a lot more time. In fact, there's a whole other world on the video-sharing site, a vibrant community largely ignored by mainstream media despite its own cadre of money-making stars and rabid fans, many of which are 12.

    Hang out for a while and you'll see patterns and tropes emerge. Don't have time for that crap?

    Scott Gairdner heroically jams it all into a single, 1:36-minute (Not Entirely Safe For Work) video.

    via The Daily What

  • Pre-caffeine tech: Digital drama and Halloween memes

    Urlesque

    calculated using every single relevant Urlesque calculated "ever single relevant costume list we could find on the Internet."

    People buy stuff like iPhones because they're envious -- and that's good. For the economy, anyway.

    Envious of the elusive white iPhone? Why not just hold your breath for the Verizon-ready iPhone 5?

    The Sony PlayStation phone is right around the corner -- wanna see?

    Google's Nexus Two could be home for the holidays -- accompanied by the latest in Android.

    Here's a video montage of "The Creepiest TV Moments of Google's CEO."

    Here's a super villian: "Back to the Future's" Doc Brown!

    MTV addresses the real problem of digital villians via its Thin Line anti-cyberbullying campaign.

    MySpace deals with it's own digital drama with a relaunch.

    Yahoo is getting a new look as well.

    Still working on your Halloween look? Here's Urlesque's "Top Meme Halloween Costumes of 2010 -- A Power Ranking."

  • Electronic dating violence is ugly reality for teens

    Cyberbullying Research Center

    In a survey of kids ages 11 to 18, one in 20 boys admits to having uploaded or shared a humiliating or harassing photo of their romantic partner online. Roughly 10 percent of both boys and girls claim to have received a threatening cell-phone message from a romantic partner. Teens are using their ever-present technology for such maliciousness that a new term had to be coined for it: "electronic dating violence."

    At a time when teenage bullying is at an all-time high, the Cyberbullying Research Center's report comes as no surprise, but that makes it all the more disheartening. Mobile and online tools give kids unprecedented power to harm one another, and in certain cases lead to irreparable tragedy, such as the suicide of Rutgers freshman Tyler Clementi in September.

    But "traditional" dating violence and this new sort being carried out on cell phones and social networks are not unrelated. According to the study:

    • "Victims of traditional (offline) dating violence are significantly more likely to be victims of electronic forms of dating violence than those who have not experienced offline bullying."

    • "Those who admit to engaging in traditional dating violence also report engaging in electronic forms of dating violence."

    While parents may think their teenagers' world is too impenetrable for them to be of assistance, some simple guidelines could actually be of help. Kids should not take or pose for any explicit photos of themselves, as the days of one-off Polaroids or burnable negatives are long gone.

    But less obvious, kids should never share their passwords with their beloveds. According to the CRC: "Youth who share their passwords with their significant other are nearly three times as likely to be victims of electronic dating violence."

    Those are a couple of ways to mitigate the threat, though the threat itself will only loom larger over time.

    For more information, visit the Cyberbullying Research Center.

    Donna Rice Hughes from Internetsafety101.org talks with msnbc about young people using online technology and mobile communications to carry out dating violence on social sites and the web.

  • Barnes & Noble unveils $249 full-color e-reader tablet

    Barnes

    Barnes & Noble today gathered the New York press to an event where they unveiled the next Nook, a full-color LCD tablet, that it will hit Walmart and Best Buy (as well as B&N stores) for $249, on or around Nov. 19.


    The Nook Color, as it'll awkwardly be known, has a 7-inch touch screen. It will have a variety of channels that resemble apps, from partners including Facebook, Twitter, Pandora and the magazine publishers Hearst, Conde Nast and National Geographic. Both FB and Twitter will be part of a "Nook Friends" mode that is heavily social. It's got a Web browser, and "Nook Extras" will include crossword puzzles, Sudoku and chess. 

    The tablet will connect via Wi-Fi, not 3G. It'll have a battery life of "up to 8 hours ... with wireless off," says the spec page.

    Though it's technically an Android tablet, it isn't a fully functioning slate computer like the iPad or the Samsung Galaxy Tab. That is to say, you won't get Google's Android Market for apps. However, according to Gizmodo, a Barnes & Noble rep did say that they will be building their app business, but that "developers have to develop them exclusively for the Nook Color." There's a chance that existing apps built for Android will be able to be ported over, but it's not clear how that process will work. There's certainly no guarantee of openness, here, but there's a glimmer of hope.

    According to the spec page, the tablet will play MP4 video, but Gizmodo reports that it will not Adobe's Flash. Supported music formats include both MP3 and AAC. 

    The device will come with 8GB of internal memory plus a MicroSD slot to add more storage. The screen has a resolution of 1024x600, and a glare-resistant coating, which will hopefully prevent the insane reflections you get when trying to read an iPad outside on a sunny day.

    Though a full-color LCD-based tablet is a welcome shift from the gray-and-black e-ink readers, it remains to be seen how well Barnes & Noble can sell these things. Amazon has made a business out of selling monochrome Kindles, at ever decreasing prices and at ever increasing volumes, but nobody else has seen success in e-ink. LCD tablets are more mass friendly, since they do more, but this move makes Barnes & Noble a direct competitor to Apple, whose iPad already runs a Nook app. A better example of the term "frenemies" would be hard to name. The price is incredible, but it suggests there's something limited about the performance, and only testing will tell us how much.

    Here's the official Barnes & Noble Nook Color page; get more photos and a video walkthrough at Gizmodo

     

  • Amazon has new 'Windowshop' app for iPad

    Amazon.com

    Amazon.com's new Windowshop app for iPad.

    Amazon.com Tuesday released "Windowshop" for Apple's iPad, a program that takes advantage of the tablet's 9.7-inch screen real estate and touch capabilities.

    Yes, it's Amazon that makes the Kindle e-reader — which some consider an iPad competitor, but Amazon's marketing also includes Kindle software programs for the iPad, as well as phones (iPhone, Android, BlackBerry) and computers (PC and Mac). The company knows how to get its message — and products — out in front of consumers.

    "Amazon Windowshop is a top-to-bottom rewrite of Amazon.com — designed and built without compromise just for iPad," said Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of Amazon.com, in a statement.

    For power-shoppers, you can find more products within a category by simply touching a category heading, and getting a list of all of the subcategories with related products.

    You can fluidly and quickly browse Amazon.com's catalog and see product videos (even without Flash on the iPad!), and access all of your wish lists using the app.

    It makes true online window-shopping online even easier — which for some of us, is NOT a good thing. Because while the app is free, it may cost you in the long run.

  • What's the riskiest country to visit -- on the Web?

    McAfee

    McAfee just released its newest malware mapping report, where it checks out malicious sites by "top level domain," generic ones like .com, plus all of those country-specific ones, such as .us. Though .com is still the place you can find the most malware, the two countries market in bright red by the security firm are Vietnam (.vn) and Cameroon (.cm). The safest country is Japan (.jp).

    When it comes to generic domains, .com was the worst, but partly because it's so huge: 56 percent of sites deemed risky are in the .com domain. Scarier is .info, which seems like it's mostly a haven for creeps. The squeaky-cleanest domains are .edu and .travel.

    The report confirms that the overall Web is getting riskier: 6.2 percent of websites on the Web as a whole are considered "risky," up from 5.8 percent last year.

    For the .vn domain, 58 percent of sites are risky. But when that is weighted in the overall picture, by comparing the sheer number of risky .vn sites to all risky sites on the Web, it goes down, by a tad. It's still nasty, so stay away! Ditto for .cm, which is 44.2 percent risky.

    What defines risky? The presence of excessive pop-ups, phishing scams or browser exploits. These include enabling viruses, keystroke logging and spyware. McAfee also tracks links to see if they direct people to other known sketchy sites.

    Reports McAfee: "Vietnam (.vn) moved from number 39 riskiest in 2009 to third riskiest in 2010. The predominant risks associated with .vn relate to malicious activity, sites being used to proxy to other malicious hosts, as well as command-and-control activity."

    So, should you set fire to your computer and hide under your desk? Should you avoid visiting any new websites ever? McAfee says, "As more criminals find ways to bury and disguise their activities, Web users must find new ways to stay on top of these threats while preserving the joy and value of surfing the Web." I guess that means you're supposed to buy their software. Maybe that's why they do these studies! In any case, just pay attention.

    McAfee via SecurityWeek via Slashdot

  • Apple Store gets a location-based check-in app

    Apple

    Apple's veering towards location-based programs like Foursquare and Facebook Places with its new Concierge app, which lets customers "check in" to an Apple Store using an iPhone.

    The new app should make things more manageable for shoppers at the busy brick-and-mortar retail hubs, and for those seeking advice from Apple "geniuses." When a customer with a reservation checks in with the app, a push notification will be sent to store employees. And a queue — well, more specifically an iQueue (what did iExpect?) — will be established to keep things moving smoothly. It'll also be more fair, at least to those who play along, showing the names of customers and what times they checked in.

    Another new app called Scout will give store managers "the ability to establish room by room locations within the store for accurate, close proximity check-ins." This is a one-time-use app, basically for store employees to set up the Concierge services with specific areas of the store in mind, according to MacStories.net.

    You can download Apple Store 1.1 from the App Store -- but just a note: you'll need iOS 4 on your iPhone in order to use the request help and check-in features.

Jump to October 2010 archive page: 1 2 3 ... 8